Russian Women Discussion

RWD Discussion Groups => Odds and Ends => Topic started by: msmob on January 15, 2020, 01:32:11 AM

Title: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: msmob on January 15, 2020, 01:32:11 AM
There's been a LOT of tosh written in the UK press about the decision of Harry and his wife Meghan to seek a lessor role

As someone who lives in a part of rural Glos'shire where Charles and Di and Princess Anne live - us 'commoners' got to see and meet the Royals, frequently ..  I 'knew' Harry when he was a 'bump' and a pub I use barred him in his excessive days .

So, forgive the 'trolling' - but I'm observing utter twaddle being posted in the news (and elsewhere)


The Royal Family have had two divorces in the nineties - Charles and Anne - yet some clueless folk seem to think this last happened when the last Royal Family member wanted to marry an American  :cluebat:


Harry was 'naughty' ..a Royal pain in the arse.. when younger and has more than redeemed himself in the military and with his Invictus Project


Do I think they can 'duck out' in Vancouver ?  Probably not - but at least the UK tabloid press will have to freeze their bits off in winter to annoy the couple.



 








Title: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: Grumpy on January 16, 2020, 08:03:36 PM


Do I think they can 'duck out' in Vancouver ?  Probably not - but at least the UK tabloid press will have to freeze their bits off in winter to annoy the couple.

The weather is way too nice in Vancouver. I recommend a beachfront property near Yellowknife, Nwt. for maximum privacy.
Title: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: Boethius on January 17, 2020, 06:05:27 PM
It rains almost continuously in Vancouver from about October to early April, is gloomy and overcast.  Plus, they're not in Vancouver, they're in Victoria, on Vancouver Island.  Of course, being the "woke" environmentalists that they are, they hop over to visit Vancouver by sea plane, rather than the more mundane, though environmentally more friendly, ferry.


This post was composed without the aid of google.
Title: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: Trenchcoat on January 19, 2020, 05:18:23 PM
I'm no fan of the Royal Family but I would say it should be an 'All In or All Out' deal. The arrangement that has been reached amounts to cherry picking the lucrative bits while ducking the duty. It allows Meg & Harry to go off and build up profitable ventures without the risk due to income that they will still gain by still being Royals, i.e Duchy of Cornwall, etc.

In fact a recent article on the BBC website detailing where they got all their money from surprised me. They all benefit from several sources all of which are derived from the population over time, taxpayers, assets seized over the centuries, etc. They are vastly wealthy yet you can see by Harry's face that he is put out by the $2.4 million they need to pay back of taxpayers money for the refurbishment of Frogmore cottage, despite having vast sums of money to have been capable of doing this themself.

For me it looks like it is high time that the whole Royal Family existence itself should be questioned. The next thing a Referendum should be held on I think.
Title: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: msmob on January 20, 2020, 01:39:31 AM
Trench, now a 'Republican' ?)))

Title: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: Trenchcoat on January 20, 2020, 07:04:48 AM
Trench, now a 'Republican' ?)))

Yes indeed, always have been :)
Title: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: GQBlues on January 20, 2020, 09:41:35 AM
I'm no fan of the Royal Family but I would say it should be an 'All In or All Out' deal. The arrangement that has been reached amounts to cherry picking the lucrative bits while ducking the duty. It allows Meg & Harry to go off and build up profitable ventures without the risk due to income that they will still gain by still being Royals, i.e Duchy of Cornwall, etc.

In fact a recent article on the BBC website detailing where they got all their money from surprised me. They all benefit from several sources all of which are derived from the population over time, taxpayers, assets seized over the centuries, etc. They are vastly wealthy yet you can see by Harry's face that he is put out by the $2.4 million they need to pay back of taxpayers money for the refurbishment of Frogmore cottage, despite having vast sums of money to have been capable of doing this themself.

For me it looks like it is high time that the whole Royal Family existence itself should be questioned. The next thing a Referendum should be held on I think.

Well, when the two females and two males heads of the royal household held their meeting (your queen and Charlie - William and Harry respectively), I guess Meghan felt she was above this royal silliness and decided not to waste her time and partake in such drama. After all, living off other people's sweat and hard work is not really something she completely grew up on despite her *liberal* upbringing. There's still a part of Meghan that's *American*, and being independent is still rooted in her being.

Meghan wanting to be a self-absorbed Hollywood celeb is her lifelong dream, and Harry is simply pussy-whipped. At this point, he's ready to give up the kingdom in a New York minute if that what makes her happy.
Title: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: msmob on January 20, 2020, 02:06:25 PM
Always entertaining to read GQB's, " I know other folks lives better than they do",  'ASSessments'

Like I said .. there's been A LOT of bollox written on this subject
Title: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: GQBlues on January 20, 2020, 05:54:17 PM
The pshyt is starting to hit the proverbial Hollywood fan already...

Quote from: Bette Midler
What a sad story. They hounded and bullied her until it was no longer tenable to stay, just like Diana. They'll never learn until it hits them in the wallet. I hope she bankrupts them all.

Quote from: Piers Morgan
People say I'm too critical of Meghan Markle - but she ditched her family, ditched her Dad, ditched most of her old friends, split Harry from William & has now split him from the Royal Family. I rest my case.

Just to quote a couple...

As for the prospective new designated peons, it appears they're not too receptive to the idea of being the surrogate caretakers either..though methinks they’ve no choice in the matter.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7895325/Nearly-three-quarters-Canadians-dont-want-pay-Harry-Meghan-living-country.html

LMAO! Mewonders if Duchess Sarah Ferguson is actually Harry's real mumski..sure looks like the resemblance is far more striking than the late Princess Diana's...maybe it's in the future *Hollywood Tell-All* revelation that may yet come out...

:devil:

Dang! We haven't yet touched on the juiciest of all...good ol' Andrew's 'custodial guardianship' of the misguided nubile that abounds. Sure looks like there's more than a graveyard full of skeleton in that royal closet, man. I bet Quentin Tarantino is chomping at the bit just about now. Maybe Steven Spielberg will get the rights and make 'Meghan's List'..
Title: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: msmob on January 21, 2020, 01:47:10 AM
GQB should give up his job and work for a tabloid rag..

Piers Morgan is the perfect example to emulate.

The written form of verbal diarrhoea  continues..
Title: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: 2tallbill on January 26, 2020, 10:14:13 AM
Prince Charles flew 16,000 miles in just 11 days
using three private jets and one helicopter before proudly posing
with Greta Thunberg in Davos


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7929735/Prince-Charles-flew-16-000-miles-just-11-days-proudly-posing-Greta-Thunberg-Davos.html

Title: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: msmob on January 27, 2020, 02:13:26 AM
I'm not sure Beel is getting the irony of quoting the Mail mocking Charles - but - certainly - HM might want to reconsider his movements
Title: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: GQBlues on January 31, 2020, 09:38:03 AM
Dammit! I was really hoping they'd stay in Canada!

http://www.msn.com/en-us/lifestyle/royals/meghan-markle-and-prince-harry-could-be-headed-to-los-angeles/ar-BBZuSV4?li=BBnbfcL

Quote
Markle could already have a team in mind. Her mother, after all, calls L.A. home and Markle's no stranger to the area herself. She was born in the suburb of Canoga Park.

LMAO! The suburb of Canoga Park??!! Where exactly is this 'suburb'? Canoga Park, outside of Pacoima and Van Nuys, is the cesspit of the San Fernando Valley.
Title: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: jone on January 31, 2020, 01:33:07 PM
Dammit! I was really hoping they'd stay in Canada!

http://www.msn.com/en-us/lifestyle/royals/meghan-markle-and-prince-harry-could-be-headed-to-los-angeles/ar-BBZuSV4?li=BBnbfcL

LMAO! The suburb of Canoga Park??!! Where exactly is this 'suburb'? Canoga Park, outside of Pacoima and Van Nuys, is the cesspit of the San Fernando Valley.

I always thought NO HO was the cesspit.   
Title: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: GQBlues on February 02, 2020, 03:10:17 PM
I always thought NO HO was the cesspit.

Not anymore. NoHo has become eclectic and artsy these days with all the effort to revitalize the community. They even have their own art district these days. It's close vicinity to Sherman Oaks, Studio City, Burbank - most of the hubbab of Hollywood studios had been making NoHo a place to be for the Holly-wannabes.

http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=noho+art+district&view=detail&mid=810AA1F9601EBA484D9C810AA1F9601EBA484D9C&FORM=VIRE

Canoga Park, OTOH, is well, still Canoga Park as it always was.
Title: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: ML on February 02, 2020, 03:47:02 PM
Not anymore. NoHo has become eclectic and artsy these days with all the effort to revitalize the community. They even have their own art district these days. It's close vicinity to Sherman Oaks, Studio City, Burbank - most of the hubbab of Hollywood studios had been making NoHo a place to be for the Holly-wannabes.

http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=noho+art+district&view=detail&mid=810AA1F9601EBA484D9C810AA1F9601EBA484D9C&FORM=VIRE

Canoga Park, OTOH, is well, still Canoga Park as it always was.

My last duty assignment in US Navy was with Bureau of Naval Weapons at Lockheed in Burbank.
I lived in apartments in Burbank and N. Hollywood.  No real complaints.

Later, as a CPA and Corporate Controller, I owned a house in Sherman Oaks.  Small bungalow that was built in housing boom after WWII.  Nice quiet neighborhood not too far from freeway.  Medium back yard, orange trees, pyracantha bushes, dichondra grass, etc.  By coincidence, I looked up the address recently.  My house was torn down and replaced by a two story monster that stretches to within 10 feet of each side property line with swimming pool taking up most of back yard. Price:  $2,700,000.
Title: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: GQBlues on February 03, 2020, 09:21:09 AM
I believe it. Sherman Oaks is a great example of pride in ownership. The homeowners there took pride and care of their property, as a result $800.00/$1,000.00 / SF community. Higher value equates to higher PT, which then equates to enhanced community infrastructure and environment.
Title: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: tfcrew on February 08, 2020, 05:07:57 PM
The X?-royal couple showed up in Miami news today waving to everybody. So much for their we want 'privacy' claims..

http://www.local10.com/entertainment/2020/02/07/prince-harry-meghan-markle-keynote-speakers-at-south-beach-event/
Title: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: GQBlues on February 08, 2020, 06:00:36 PM
LMAO!

Quote from: Couple's Spokeperson
We do not comment on their private schedule..

There's an interview done on Meghan, and apparently she was 'deeply' hurt no one in good ol' Buckingham asked her how she was coping being a 'duchess' and now a 'mother'. Sheeesh! Talk about a typical self-absorbed holly-wannabe....Harry said he decided to step down to protect his family from heading the same fate his late mother did. They'd like to live a 'normal' quiet life...LMAO. By doing interviews, speeches and hanging out with the elites of Hollywood.

Chrissaakes...I feel really sorry for the child. He (she?) is about to be raised by parents with deep issues and hang-ups in life. And they're all out there trying to find themselves while on the public dole.

Life must be really, really tough for these two (3).
Title: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: msmob on February 08, 2020, 11:36:41 PM
Hmm, the usual culprit with a 'tabloid analysis'..

For those who lived near where Harry's family grew up....There was rarely a time when his family were left alone, after his Ma and Pa separated.

Before that, there was an unwritten rule that the press DID Zgive the family peace and they DID have privacy on their large estates ...there might have been a photo shoot on holidays..but then the family has peace.

His older brother, rightly, stamped on the press when photographers got shots of him rubbing sun cream onto his topless wife by a pool on a remote estate in France.


On one hand H&M have a father in law who sells his opinion / recollections to the highest bidder (tashy) and they are now going to earn their own way, at functions where they EXPECT photos ..

As ever, GQB doesn't get it..





Title: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: BillyB on February 08, 2020, 11:46:27 PM
The X?-royal couple showed up in Miami news today waving to everybody. So much for their we want 'privacy' claims..

http://www.local10.com/entertainment/2020/02/07/prince-harry-meghan-markle-keynote-speakers-at-south-beach-event/

They don’t mind interacting with the public. They just have a problem with the paparazzi that’ll follow them into the bathroom.
Title: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: tfcrew on February 09, 2020, 03:19:22 PM
  They just have a problem with the paparazzi that’ll follow them into the bathroom.
%#*@ on their cameras.
Title: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: GQBlues on February 10, 2020, 09:46:01 AM
It really is hard for me to not have compassion for people like these two, with all their life's issues, hang-ups, and challenges (LMAO), be so horribly subjected to a lifestyle not of their making..

May life's gravy eternally flow upon these two  (http://www.buzznet.com/2020/01/prince-harry-and-meghans-vancouver-island-home/?utm_source=tb&utm_medium=msn-msn-home-tb&utm_term=Inside+Meghan+%26+Harry%27s+%2418+Million+Mansion-https%3A%2F%2Fwww.buzznet.com%2Fhivemedia-images%2Fcreatives%2Fhvi%2F2.5_hvi.jpg&utm_content=2876705711&utm_campaign=3694248-tb&utm_source=tb&chrome=1)

Really breaks your heart, man. I hope no one really expects them to actually 'work for a living' from now on.
Title: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: 2tallbill on February 10, 2020, 02:58:47 PM
"Historians say Harry's marriage to Meghan adds a whole new
dimension to the Royal Family line. Not because she's of mixed
race, but because they are not related." Argus Hamilton 
Title: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: Boethius on February 10, 2020, 03:38:08 PM
HAHA.  But, he's wrong.  They are, in fact, distantly related through Thomas Markle and the Queen Mother.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5027891/Harry-Meghan-cousins-family-tree-1480-reveals.html (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5027891/Harry-Meghan-cousins-family-tree-1480-reveals.html)


Google was used to locate the above (previously read) link.
Title: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: msmob on February 10, 2020, 04:13:35 PM
Ouch, touche..   
Title: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: GQBlues on February 11, 2020, 09:25:59 AM
TFF!!! Money does make people hypocrites!!

http://pagesix.com/2020/02/10/meghan-markle-prince-harry-face-backlash-after-attending-miami-summit/

So much for going to therapy for whatever hang-ups from the past, eh Harry? A cool million dollars and dinner with ARod and Jlo can cure all the blues, man.

This one is a 'dandy'! Definitely straight outta Compton!

http://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2020-02-11/meghan-markle-racism-england-black-britons

Title: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: jone on February 11, 2020, 09:48:04 AM
Am curious to know how much they were compensated for their departure from their leisurely travel plans.

Frankly, I think Meghan is a breath of fresh air in the Windsor line.  She can be pretty hot!  I wonder what Harry will use as a last name, now that he is now longer a practicing senior royal?
Title: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: GQBlues on February 11, 2020, 11:46:38 AM
Likely a *princely* sum to insure the 'skeletons in the royal closet' remain a royal secret from any 'tell-all' interview offers. Heh-heh!

Never say never though. After all, look at how easily Harry did away with his 'environmental' concerns when offered a million bucks by a major oil/energy investor.
Title: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: jone on February 11, 2020, 11:53:19 AM
I bet he will sit on some Boards and do a little endorsing.   Kind of behind the scenes type stuff.   Not too much to embarrass his grandmother.   Just enough to put aside $500,000,000 or so.
Title: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: 2tallbill on February 11, 2020, 12:45:56 PM
I bet he will sit on some Boards and do a little endorsing.   Kind of behind the scenes type stuff.   Not too much to embarrass his grandmother.   Just enough to put aside $500,000,000 or so.

Jone, have you ever even been a prince? I've personally had
all sorts of actual experience, very important experience!
1. I actually saw the tower of London
2. Listened to the Beatles.
3. Took a photo of Big Ben

Sir Paul, I'll have you know is a knight. Now I need to be treated
as a total expert and everyone else should realize that arguments
that differ in any way from mine are total bollox and they are
posting daft.

I will also follow you around and bring up this topic on every
thread across all the forums forever until I die even if I never
ever make a point.

 :D
Title: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: GQBlues on February 11, 2020, 12:59:09 PM
I bet he will sit on some Boards and do a little endorsing.   Kind of behind the scenes type stuff.   Not too much to embarrass his grandmother.   Just enough to put aside $500,000,000 or so.

If he (they) haven't yet already. I'm sure these two have had 'hundreds' on advice, offers, suggestions, recommendations, etc. Even before they made 'The Decision' (Can anyone say, *LeBron James*?).

Maybe Harry can do those late night hair plug commercials as I heard he's getting a bit concerned of going bald. Meghan is interested in doing 'voice-overs'. Like Disney need another 'Goofy' shrieker. If they do, all I can say is, they better ask how she's doing everyday because she's very touchy and fragile about that. If her feelings are hurt, they may move to Mexico...
Title: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: jone on February 11, 2020, 01:02:15 PM
Jone, have you ever even been a prince? I've personally had
all sorts of actual experience, very important experience!
1. I actually saw the tower of London
2. Listened to the Beatles.
3. Took a photo of Big Ben

Sir Paul, I'll have you know is a knight. Now I need to be treated
as a total expert and everyone else should realize that arguments
that differ in any way from mine are total bollox and they are
posting daft.

I will also follow you around and bring up this topic on every
thread across all the forums forever until I die even if I never
ever make a point.

 :D

Hey.  Did you watch the movie, Yesterday?   It was a gas.  Especially if you are a Beatles fan, like me.   Even if you're not a Beatles fan it is still a good flick.   My kids liked it.   And they had no idea who Ringo is (was).
Title: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: 2tallbill on February 11, 2020, 01:08:50 PM
Hey.  Did you watch the movie, Yesterday?   It was a gas.  Especially if you are a Beatles fan, like me.   Even if you're not a Beatles fan it is still a good flick.   My kids liked it.   And they had no idea who Ringo is (was).

I watched it twice in the theaters and at least 4 times at home.
Angel Eyes watched it twice with me.
Title: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: GQBlues on February 11, 2020, 01:39:34 PM
Hey.  Did you watch the movie, Yesterday?   It was a gas.  Especially if you are a Beatles fan, like me.   Even if you're not a Beatles fan it is still a good flick.
 

Love the ‘Let It Be’ scene. Besides just watching Lily James is worth the price of admission.

Quote
My kids liked it.   And they had no idea who Ringo is (was).

Now who doesn’t know Boris Johnson’s uncle by now? ;P
Title: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: jone on February 11, 2020, 02:31:55 PM
Shoulda known.

Yeah.  I'm on my third go on it.   The effervescent Miss James stole the show.   I understand Sir Paul went to a theater and watched it with the crowd.   Can you imagine seeing that movie and then seeing him sitting behind you?   In a way, it introduces these songs to a whole 'nother generation.
Title: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: GQBlues on February 11, 2020, 03:58:13 PM
Himesh Patel sold that movie with his performance though. Superb casting. He wasn't as riveting as Rami Malek in his role as Freddie Mercury, but both are equally artistic...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nnumx-LN-EQ

..or as Ed Sheeran kept noting "Yeah, Hey Dude is the way to go with this!"
Title: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: msmob on February 11, 2020, 11:15:07 PM
. Now I need to be treated
as a total expert and everyone else should realize that arguments
that differ in any way from mine are total bollox and they are
posting daft.

I will also follow you around and bring up this topic on every
thread across all the forums forever until I die even if I never
ever make a point.

 :

Experts who oft  bumped into Harry's family  ( when growing up and the press knew better, after hounding his Ma) spell realiSe, correctly., on a very British subject. :D

PS I am a subject of the Queen..and it is fine by me.
Title: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: SANDRO43 on February 12, 2020, 07:42:35 AM
I wonder what Harry will use as a last name, now that he is now longer a practicing senior royal?

IINM, it should still be Windsor unless he wants to change it - again as happend in 1917 from the original Saxe-Coburg and Gotha, due to anti-German sentiment.   

(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/73/Badge_of_the_House_of_Windsor.svg/800px-Badge_of_the_House_of_Windsor.svg.png)
The Badge of the House of Windsor,
as approved by King George VI in 1938

                                                                           
Title: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: 2tallbill on February 12, 2020, 07:46:49 AM
Experts who oft  bumped into Harry's family

Do I need to break out my photo of Big Ben?
Title: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: msmob on February 12, 2020, 11:32:52 AM
Do I need to break out my photo of Big Ben?

That would only enhance your DAFTNESS..

Pray tell us the connection of Harry and Meghan to a BELL that isn't even in use at the mo ...?

After, the split of his parents where did Harry spend half his time ?  Was it London, Manchester (  :rolleyes: ) or nr. Tetbury - a small town 15 mins from me ?


Which pubs did he go to and where was he banned ?


Looking forward to you trying to find this on 'Google' ..



Title: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: 2tallbill on February 12, 2020, 11:37:10 AM

That would only enhance your DAFTNESS..

I'm a world renown expert on all things Royal because I
had a photo of myself with a Beefeater, so now you are
posting DAFT.

Big Ben AND a Beefeater, you need to back off and post
on things you know.
Title: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: Faux Pas on February 12, 2020, 01:23:05 PM

That would only enhance your DAFTNESS..

Pray tell us the connection of Harry and Meghan to a BELL that isn't even in use a the mo ...?

After, the split of his parents where did Harry spend half his time ?  Was it London, Manchester (  :rolleyes: ) or nr. Tetbury - a small town 15 mins from me ?


Which pubs did he go to and where was he banned ?


Looking forward to you trying to find this on 'Google' ..

Does this explain Harry's daftness, yours or both?
Title: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: msmob on February 12, 2020, 01:46:11 PM
I'm a world renown expert on all things Royal because I
had a photo of myself with a Beefeater, so now you are
posting DAFT.

Big Ben AND a Beefeater, you need to back off and post
on things you know.

No irony spotted and you can't answers MY questions as Google won't help you ..


Harry was banned from the Ragged Cot ...   I knew the landlord ...   His regular was The Rattlebone at Sherston


In those days the press would have left him alone and he was able to lead a relatively normal existence ..



Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: 2tallbill on February 12, 2020, 02:28:53 PM
No irony spotted and you can't answers MY questions as Google won't help you ..

My last posts sailed over your head. If you asked, somebody might
help you out.
Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: I/O on February 12, 2020, 02:45:50 PM
Difference between Hugh Grant and Harry? Huge paid much less for his BJ than Harry did/will. Quality of the service provider - much of a muchness.....


I'm a royalist but to be frank, I think Harry has milked the public sympathy of "My mum died when I was young" more than enough. If you take that away from his speaking engagements, there doesn't seem to be much else of substance....
Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: GQBlues on February 12, 2020, 03:21:56 PM
Difference between Hugh Grant and Harry? Huge paid much less for his BJ than Harry did/will. Quality of the service provider - much of a muchness.....

I'm a royalist but to be frank, I think Harry has milked the public sympathy of "My mum died when I was young" more than enough. If you take that away from his speaking engagements, there doesn't seem to be much else of substance....

Touche', in full agreement with you.

I can't imagine how many millions of 'young boys' in the world who had to live through far harder days brought about by the rape and murder of their respective mothers at the hands of the colonists. So cry me a river, Harry!
Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: Boethius on February 12, 2020, 04:16:52 PM
Difference between Hugh Grant and Harry? Huge paid much less for his BJ than Harry did/will. Quality of the service provider - much of a muchness.....

Harry has no independent source of income.  He has trust income (half his mother's divorce settlement), which likely is creditor proofed from any future divorce action.  See Andrew as an example.  Diana only received a settlement because Charles could liquidate assets from his Duchy of Cornwall income.

I find it rather ironic that Harry and Meghan's future wealth will come from speeches/endorsements/activities not in the U.K. or in commonwealth countries, but in the "anti monarchist" USA.  I guess those royal titles mean something there after all.

Quote
I'm a royalist but to be frank, I think Harry has milked the public sympathy of "My mum died when I was young" more than enough. If you take that away from his speaking engagements, there doesn't seem to be much else of substance....

Even with the speaking engagements, there's not much of substance there.  He's a dim bulb who married a grifter.

moby is correct above about Harry's protection from the press in the UK.  Once Harry is no longer officially a member of the royal family (i.e., no royal duties), a lot of the "fixing" courtiers now do may disappear, and his foibles will be fair game.

This post was composed without the aid of google.
Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: msmob on February 12, 2020, 05:54:16 PM
My last posts sailed over your head. If you asked, somebody might
help you out.

'Sailed over my head' ;)

Like a Scots King never ruled England ?  :ROFL:

DAFT posters shouldn't get protected from my pointing out their howlers ..

Clue James I of Britain and Ireland  ( includes England) - he was James VI of Scotland  - first in the Stuart dynasty - after the Tudors .. :welcome:
Title: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: 2tallbill on February 12, 2020, 06:37:57 PM
'Sailed over my head' ;)

Like a Scots King never ruled England ?  :ROFL:

DAFT posters shouldn't get protected from my pointing out their howlers ..

Clue James I of Britain and Ireland  ( includes England) - he was James VI of Scotland  - first in the Stuart dynasty - after the Tudors .. :welcome:

I was doing a Moby, claiming expertise because of some lame connection
like a photo of Big Ben and having been to London for a few days. I know
nothing and care even less about Palace intrigue in the UK.

So yes, it sailed over your head.
Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: msmob on February 12, 2020, 06:40:24 PM
I was doing a Moby, claiming expertise because of some lame connection
like a photo of Big Ben and having been to London for a few days. I know
nothing and care even less about Palace intrigue in the UK.

So yes, it sailed over your head.

No, you just failed.. You REALLY didn't know that you can't take a photo of Big Ben ;)
Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: Faux Pas on February 12, 2020, 08:51:02 PM
I was doing a Moby, claiming expertise because of some lame connection
like a photo of Big Ben and having been to London for a few days. I know
nothing and care even less about Palace intrigue in the UK.

So yes, it sailed over your head.

*AGAST*

You mean the fact that Harry stayed 15 min from Moobs means nothing to you? Say it ain't so!
Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: msmob on February 13, 2020, 01:11:30 AM


Yet another drive-by troll fail by Mr Mistake.

The point is that although Harry was making a spectacle of himself, as a youth it did not mean photos of his life, constantly in the papers..


The locals knew he had a Prtection detail to whisk him off.


Now, having 'settled down' he and his family should be allowed some privacy..on private property..their home, etc.,


Some folk seem to think their being paid to attend events means they are 'open season' for the 'press' at all times.


His wife's Dad...no matter what passes between them should NOT be selling his 'recollectoons' to the press.






Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: Faux Pas on February 13, 2020, 04:43:31 AM

Yet another drive-by troll fail by Mr Mistake.

The point is that although Harry was making a spectacle of himself, as a youth it did not mean photos of his life, constantly in the papers..


The locals knew he had a Prtection detail to whisk him off.


Now, having 'settled down' he and his family should be allowed some privacy..on private property..their home, etc.,


Some folk seem to think their being paid to attend events means they are 'open season' for the 'press' at all times.


His wife's Dad...no matter what passes between them should NOT be selling his 'recollectoons' to the press.

So YOU say but, you're wrong all the time.  :ROFL:

Harry and Meghan are media whores. They cling to it like flies to sh*t. If they wanted privacy, they'd have it
Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: msmob on February 13, 2020, 05:54:53 AM
So YOU say but, you're wrong all the time.  :ROFL:

-


Mr 'nick's s not as apt as yours..  You're as off piste as ever with your knowledge and conclusions...

This is the perfect example:

Harry and Meghan are media whores. They cling to it like flies to sh*t. If they wanted privacy, they'd have it

A few writs flying around re the lack of privacy in places all should expect it would be a clue to a more discerning, reasoned, chap..

Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: GQBlues on February 13, 2020, 05:55:22 AM
Harry and Meghan are media whores. They cling to it like flies to shit. If they wanted privacy, they'd have it

:ROFL:

That baggage-ridden, life issue-riddled sap of a ‘prince’ actually agreed to speak at the request of Goldman Sachs, and supposedly for ‘free’. Holy Molly! I’m glad they’re finally living their quiet, private lives away from any media attention.
Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: msmob on February 13, 2020, 06:27:05 AM
The other Muppet arrived to demonstrate when privacy is not an issue.


Does Harry charge for his time re Invictus?


I do not know...I DO know that he courts publicity for the participants and is walking a thin line ...as he needs the press. 

The press who appreciate..unlike Mr Mistake and GQB that even Prince's can expect the home and family time to be off limits..

Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: GQBlues on February 13, 2020, 06:55:13 AM

Does Harry....re Invictus?

:ROFL: Now that’s REALLY funny!
Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: Faux Pas on February 13, 2020, 07:12:50 AM

Mr 'nick's s not as apt as yours..  You're as off piste as ever with your knowledge and conclusions...

This is the perfect example:

A few writs flying around re the lack of privacy in places all should expect it would be a clue to a more discerning, reasoned, chap..

If the couple wanted privacy they would have it. They have enough money and influence to make that happen. Call it what it is, Meghan's attempt to upstage the Queen and dragging the pussy whipped Harry in front of every camera she can find. A million bucks for speaking to Goldman Sachs  :ROFL:

You just can't make this shit up
Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: msmob on February 13, 2020, 07:50:54 AM
I see a similarity emerging here...

Lover's of gossip

Re JP Morgan:

"The couple may have earned about £750,000 for their Miami appearance but palace sources said they did not accept a fee."  quoting the Daily Mirror (UK)

Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: GQBlues on February 13, 2020, 08:30:41 AM
:ROFL:

http://nypost.com/2020/02/12/it-didnt-take-long-for-harry-and-meghan-to-prove-they-are-hypocrites/

http://www.vanityfair.com/style/2020/02/prince-harry-and-meghan-markle-disney-goldman-sachs

http://www.insider.com/meghan-markle-prince-harry-could-breach-megxit-deal-2020-2

Atta boy, Harry! Make a *royal* mess why don't you. Royally air it all out! Start with good ol' Andrew!!!

This segment was really funny!!
Quote
Harry, a 35-year-old man who knows little of the real world, let alone macro- and micro-economics or likely how to work an ATM, spoke to an audience including former Prime Minister Tony Blair, Patriots owner Robert Kraft and architect Sir Norman Foster.

Quote from: Harry, the royal sap
..I had “no other option” given the “many years of challenges I faced as a result of losing my mother, I was forced march behind her casket as a 12-year-old boy, and the ongoing mental health challenges from which I suffer. Every single time I hear a click, every single time I see a flash, it takes me straight back.”

This dude really need a good dose of reality and live in the real world!
Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: msmob on February 13, 2020, 09:34:06 AM
GQB

Harry has been a 'Royal' PiA - but where YOU present in his life ?  Do you know the circumstances of expectations a kid was subjected to by being told he must follow his VERY famous Mum's coffin through a somewhat hysterical outpouring of grief ?

He's clearly damaged goods in that respect - but he's clearly decided his family shouldn't have to put up with media intrusion in places where the media should  be respecting their privacy .....


I'm 'confused' by your posts.. 

On one hand  you expect Harry to 'suck it up' - yet you are the type to follow the gutter press and make judgements ..on situations you've not been involved in ..

Are you having trouble sleeping ... ?








Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: GQBlues on February 13, 2020, 09:58:19 AM
GQB

Harry has been a 'Royal' PiA - but where YOU present in his life ?  Do you know the circumstances of expectations a kid was subjected to by being told he must follow his VERY famous Mum's coffin through a somewhat hysterical outpouring of grief ?

Do you know the grief of millions of children the world over that REALLY suffered under the hands of the colonists when they raped and murdered THEIR mothers in cold blood in the name of YOUR king/queen? Were YOU present in any of their lives? Silly question, isn't it?

Quote
He's clearly damaged goods in that respect - but he's clearly decided his family shouldn't have to put up with media intrusion in places where the media should  be respecting their privacy .....

YUP. He is a pampered damaged goods who now will understand what life is really like. Period. If he's trying to avoid media intrusion and shield his family from it, then WTF he, and his wife, keep chasing media attention by lining up all these speaking arrangements?

This idiot is fair game now. That's just the facts.
Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: msmob on February 14, 2020, 03:28:37 AM
As usual, obfuscation ..

Do you know the grief of millions of children the world over that REALLY suffered under the hands of the colonists when they raped and murdered THEIR mothers in cold blood in the name of YOUR king/queen? Were YOU present in any of their lives? Silly question, isn't it?

THIS thread is about the present and your question was irrelevant, indeed



YUP. He is a pampered damaged goods who now will understand what life is really like. Period. If he's trying to avoid media intrusion and shield his family from it, then WTF he, and his wife, keep chasing media attention by lining up all these speaking arrangements?

Er, because when he's at home, on holiday or just hangin' out with his kids - that's not work ...




This idiot is fair game now. That's just the facts.

No.. it's a opinion ... formed of an  'interesting' viewpoint
Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: Faux Pas on February 21, 2020, 10:58:10 AM
So much for the privacy. But I do suppose this is slumming Royals style

http://pagesix.com/2020/02/21/prince-harry-meghan-markle-eyeing-7m-malibu-mansion-once-owned-by-david-charvet/
Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: GQBlues on February 21, 2020, 11:38:28 AM
You gotta live large cutting free fats off the hog while you can. I can't say I blame them. They have an entire country's sweat financing their quest of 'finding themselves' and cleanse themselves of the rigors and challenges of being 'royals'! They certainly fit nicely with all of their Hollywood a-lister neighbors. Nothing like chatting up with the likes of Caitlyn Jenner. Once heralded as the best male Olympic athlete of all time! LMAO! Oh, the irony!

BTW, Methinks this couple + baby Archie will not be cruising through the streets of *Windsor Hills* to visit grand-mama without the British Army tugging along.

...and speaking of privacy, a happy shout-out BDay to good ol' Andrew, the roving prince - 2nd son of her royalness! He's been grounded by the royal mother hen for his sexual adventures with Epstein. Gloria Allred hired a US-style bus and posted a poster with Andrew's mug alongside a caption that read: "If you see this man please ask him to call the FBI to answer their questions.”. The bus had been circling around The Mall.

What fun!
Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: msmob on February 21, 2020, 02:34:58 PM
So much for the privacy.

http://pagesix.com/2020/02/21/prince-harry-meghan-markle-eyeing-7m-malibu-mansion-once-owned-by-david-charvet/

Well, indeed - every internet idiot is posting a possible address ..

You gotta live large cutting free fats off the hog while you can. I can't say I blame them. They have an entire country's sweat financing their quest of 'finding themselves' and cleanse themselves of the rigors and challenges of being 'royals'! They certainly fit nicely with all of their Hollywood a-lister neighbors. Nothing like chatting up with the likes of Caitlyn Jenner. Once heralded as the best male Olympic athlete of all time! LMAO! Oh, the irony!

BTW, Methinks this couple + baby Archie will not be cruising through the streets of *Windsor Hills* to visit grand-mama without the British Army tugging along.

'Me' doesn't think..  The British Army in the US / Canada... ? That's been a while..


...and speaking of privacy, a happy shout-out BDay to good ol' Andrew, the roving prince - 2nd son of her royalness! He's been grounded by the royal mother hen for his sexual adventures with Epstein.

'Grounded' ?  You mean no Royal duties ?  ...losing patronages of charities / doctorates ..  It's not like he's not allowed out ... other than not wishing  currently to visit the US.

He's not trying to hide from justice and running from the site of killing someone... unlike wive's of US service personnel  ..




Gloria Allred hired a US-style bus and posted a poster with Andrew's mug alongside a caption that read: "If you see this man please ask him to call the FBI to answer their questions.”. The bus had been circling around The Mall.

What fun!




http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/feb/21/lawyer-epstein-victims-prince-andrew-school-bus-buckingham-palace-fbi (http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/feb/21/lawyer-epstein-victims-prince-andrew-school-bus-buckingham-palace-fbi)


He should have been 'allowed' to marry Koo Stark







Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: GQBlues on February 21, 2020, 02:56:13 PM
Contrary to reports, of course...

http://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1234393/Prince-Andrew-Royal-news-Epstein-case-investigation-latest-Lisa-Bloom

http://www.newsweek.com/epstein-lawyer-prince-andrew-lisa-bloom-fbi-1484332

http://www.thesun.co.uk/news/10411089/prince-andrew-royal-protection-silence-epstein/

etc...
Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: Boethius on February 21, 2020, 05:27:08 PM
None of those reports prove Prince Andrew has refused to cooperate with the FBI.  He says they haven't tried to question him, and has stated he is willing to speak to the FBI.


Civil lawyers for the victims probably don't know what's happening in an ongoing police investigation.  Andrew may be refusing to cooperate, he may not be.  We just don't know.


Further, The Sun and The Express are both tabloids.  It's akin to using People or The National Enquirer as a news source (although granted, the latter has broken stories).


This post was composed without the aid of google.
Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: Faux Pas on February 21, 2020, 07:21:51 PM
None of those reports prove Prince Andrew has refused to cooperate with the FBI.  He says they haven't tried to question him, and has stated he is willing to speak to the FBI.


Civil lawyers for the victims probably don't know what's happening in an ongoing police investigation.  Andrew may be refusing to cooperate, he may not be.  We just don't know.


Further, The Sun and The Express are both tabloids.  It's akin to using People or The National Enquirer as a news source (although granted, the latter has broken stories).


This post was composed without the aid of google.

Maybe you should Google more

http://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/27/nyregion/jeffrey-epstein-prince-andrew.html (http://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/27/nyregion/jeffrey-epstein-prince-andrew.html)

Epstein didn't kill himself
Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: BillyB on February 21, 2020, 08:15:05 PM
Further, The Sun and The Express are both tabloids.  It's akin to using People or The National Enquirer as a news source (although granted, the latter has broken stories).



the trend I'm seeing is a lot of the tabloids are getting into reporting real news and a lot of the new organizations are getting into reporting tabloid quality stories.

None of those reports prove Prince Andrew has refused to cooperate with the FBI.  He says they haven't tried to question him, and has stated he is willing to speak to the FBI.


Andrew has recently refused cooperation with the FBI after saying he's willing to speak to them. I don't blame Andrew. After watching the FBI and Mueller wanting to question Trump and anybody associated with him, I've learned the FBI isn't going to be a friend to anybody they question. They trap people and are looking to get them in trouble. The FBI already knows the answers to many of the questions they ask so when they catch a lie, they use the full force of the law to twist the arm of the person that came in voluntarily for questioning.
Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: msmob on February 22, 2020, 01:47:58 AM



Andrew has recently refused cooperation with the FBI

On what do you base this 'contention' ?

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/feb/01/claims-that-prince-andrew-failed-to-respond-to-fbi-likely-political-say-prosecutors (http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/feb/01/claims-that-prince-andrew-failed-to-respond-to-fbi-likely-political-say-prosecutors)

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jan/29/prince-andrew-angry-claims-not-cooperating-jeffrey-epstein-inquiry (http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jan/29/prince-andrew-angry-claims-not-cooperating-jeffrey-epstein-inquiry)

I'm sure the FBI would love to see the inside of Buck Palace .. 




 I don't blame Andrew. After watching the FBI and Mueller wanting to question Trump and anybody associated with him, I've learned the FBI isn't going to be a friend to anybody they question. They trap people and are looking to get them in trouble. The FBI already knows the answers to many of the questions they ask so when they catch a lie, they use the full force of the law to twist the arm of the person that came in voluntarily for questioning.

BillyB,

are the FBI any different in their questioning techniques than the UK Police or UKBA agency - if they are trying to get to the facts ....?

No...

In time, I suspect you'll realise that insufficient evidence means not guilty - legally - but the truth often comes out later ..


Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: GQBlues on February 22, 2020, 07:35:01 AM
None of those reports prove Prince Andrew has refused to cooperate with the FBI.  He says they haven't tried to question him, and has stated he is willing to speak to the FBI.


Civil lawyers for the victims probably don't know what's happening in an ongoing police investigation.  Andrew may be refusing to cooperate, he may not be.  We just don't know.


Further, The Sun and The Express are both tabloids.  It's akin to using People or The National Enquirer as a news source (although granted, the latter has broken stories).


This post was composed without the aid of google.

Wow! Coming from someone who tripped over herself and bought into the whole Russian collusion tale hook, line and sinker.

Okay. Opinion heard.
Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: msmob on February 22, 2020, 07:39:38 AM
Wow! Coming from someone who tripped over herself and bought into the whole Russian collusion tale hook, line and sinker.

Okay. Opinion heard.

As opposed to buying 'not sufficient evidence' for a prosecution means the issue has gone away ..



Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: Boethius on February 22, 2020, 09:47:54 AM
Wow! Coming from someone who tripped over herself and bought into the whole Russian collusion tale hook, line and sinker.

Okay. Opinion heard.


Please point to all my posts on Russian collusion where I allege Russian collusion "hook, line, and sinker".


All I've ever noted re Mueller is that if there is any evidence, it does have to be investigated.


This post was composed without the aid of google.
Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: GQBlues on February 22, 2020, 10:11:27 AM
The root cause of the investigation was the hilarious 'Dossier', which you touted on the board as though it was the bible. And yes, we've gone through the exercise of proving YOU bought into that silly *collusion* on this very board before.

I've no time or interest re-litigating that silliness again.
Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: Boethius on February 22, 2020, 10:14:06 AM
Please point to all these posts.  I rarely post on US politics because I DON'T CARE.  This is the only post I could find -

http://www.russianwomendiscussion.com/index.php?topic=23976.msg519195#msg519195 (http://www.russianwomendiscussion.com/index.php?topic=23976.msg519195#msg519195)


This post was composed without the aid of google.  The forum's search function was used.
Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: BillyB on February 22, 2020, 07:24:02 PM

BillyB,

are the FBI any different in their questioning techniques than the UK Police or UKBA agency - if they are trying to get to the facts ....?


I used to think the FBI was trying to just get the facts but they have shown they are actually trying to get people in trouble without facts. Look at the damage they did to Carter Page's reputation just so they can get permission to tap the Trump tower. Carter page was a CIA source so he had a lot of dealings with Russia. When the FBI asked the CIA if Carter Page was one of their own, the CIA said "yes" so the FBI doctored the CIA email response to say "no" so they could get a FISA court judge to give them permission to tap the Trump tower which led to 2+ years of investigations on Trump. The Mueller investigation concluded no Americans colluded with Russia to affect the American election. If the FBI did things by the book, they wouldn't have created a mess since a FISA court judge would've stopped them due to lack of evidence. The FBI makes up evidence so it's apparent, they didn't care about facts.

I'm not sticking up for Prince Andrew. I think he did wrong but I don't blame him for not cooperating with the FBI. After recent events in America, any good attorney would tell their client don't cooperate with the FBI if you don't have to.
Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: msmob on February 22, 2020, 10:32:32 PM
I used to think the FBI was trying to just get the facts but they have shown they are actually trying to get people in trouble without facts. Look at the damage they did to Carter Page's reputation just so they can get permission to tap the Trump tower. Carter page was a CIA source so he had a lot of dealings with Russia. When the FBI asked the CIA if Carter Page was one of their own, the CIA said "yes" so the FBI doctored the CIA email response to say "no" so they could get a FISA court judge to give them permission to tap the Trump tower which led to 2+ years of investigations on Trump. The Mueller investigation concluded no Americans colluded with Russia to affect the American election. If the FBI did things by the book, they wouldn't have created a mess since a FISA court judge would've stopped them due to lack of evidence. The FBI makes up evidence so it's apparent, they didn't care about facts.

I'm not sticking up for Prince Andrew. I think he did wrong but I don't blame him for not cooperating with the FBI. After recent events in America, any good attorney would tell their client don't cooperate with the FBI if you don't have to.

So, basically you are saying your judiciary system cannot protect the innocent and fails to convict the guilty ?... 

As for Prince Andrew .. short of flying into a media shit-storm in the US  ... why aren't the FBI coming for a chat at Buck Palace ?   

Folks paying for buses to 'embarrass' him are simply swinging public opinion in the UK to feel sorry for him

Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: BillyB on February 22, 2020, 10:46:53 PM
So, basically you are saying your judiciary system cannot protect the innocent and fails to convict the guilty ?... 


No Americans was found guilty of collusion with Russia according to a long and very expensive investigation by Mueller so it didn't make it to the courts. But if it did make it the courts, everybody would be found innocent because there is no evidence.
Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: msmob on February 22, 2020, 10:59:36 PM
No Americans was found guilty of collusion with Russia according to a long and very expensive investigation by Mueller so it didn't make it to the courts. But if it did make it the courts, everybody would be found innocent because there is no evidence.



 :ROFL:

How did I KNOW, you'd suddenly become 'patriotic' rather than admit you'd just busted yourself ..?

Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: GQBlues on March 10, 2020, 08:27:04 AM
LMAO! Even the Kardashians weren't this dramatic...These guys are simply spoiled brats. They wouldn't be like this if they had jobs instead of enjoying life from the sweaty backs of their subjects.

Huge difference compared to Trump's kids...

 http://www.msn.com/en-us/lifestyle/royals/prince-harry-and-meghan-markle-bid-farewell-to-royal-life-with-hideously-awkward-family-meeting/ar-BB10XpaM

Enjoy the video insert and witness the awkward gathering of fools...

:devil:

Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: Boethius on March 10, 2020, 09:00:05 AM
A century old church procession is hardly the place to glad hand.


This post was composed without the aid of google.
Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: GQBlues on March 10, 2020, 09:13:22 AM
:ROFL:

Didn't stop good ol' Eddie and Sophie to *at least* exchange some pleasantries with Willie Charlie and Katie like decent families should.

C'mon, come up with a better excuse than that.

Quote
This could, so easily—with the merest set of smiles and waves, or even the barest of conversations—have been an occasion of reconciliation in front of the cameras (real or not). Instead, it was an excruciating ignor-athon, a masterclass of social distancing.

:devil:

BTW - does that pedophile Andrew still attend this 'century old church processions'? I'm sure there were lot's of minors in attendance, no?
Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: msmob on March 10, 2020, 09:29:44 AM
The above post is an example of the sort of attention Harry and Meghan will be seeking to avoid as they will no longer BE in receipt of loot from OUR - not his - sweaty backs .. :popcorn:



Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: GQBlues on March 10, 2020, 09:52:34 AM
...and I can't wait for these guys to make their Holly-Lala-wood landing!! Hang out with Lindsay Lohan & company...Nothing like a 'tell-all' book deal about life with the royal yadayada in exchange for a few bucks! Oh fun...

Ka-Ching, baby!
Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: Boethius on March 10, 2020, 10:07:19 AM
:ROFL:

Didn't stop good ol' Eddie and Sophie to *at least* exchange some pleasantries with Willie Charlie and Katie like decent families should.

C'mon, come up with a better excuse than that.

 >:D

BTW - does that pedophile Andrew still attend this 'century old church processions'? I'm sure there were lot's of minors in attendance, no?

Andrew isn't a pedophile.  He's at best, an ephebophile. 

As to the church, it's not an excuse.  This is a working event, a very formal occasion, which follows rules of protocol, down to where parties are seated.

What would you deem appropriate?  Knocking down chairs in the church to give Harry and Meghan a full on bear hug?    Should Meghan go sit in Charles' lap à law Trump/Ivanka?

We don't know if they saw each other earlier, either.  A cursory acknowledgement is normal.

I doubt you will see any tell alls.  I would hazard a guess part of Charles' continued funding to the tune of $3 million a year is an airtight NDA.  MM is already breaking that with her leaks to the press, but mostly about minor things.

This post was composed without the aid of google.
Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: GQBlues on March 10, 2020, 10:45:19 AM
Andrew isn't a pedophile.  He's at best, an ephebophile. 

Oh, that's just funny! Not according Allred and her clients. But of course YOU know exactly what happened.

As to the church, it's not an excuse.  This is a very formal occasion, which follows rules of protocol, down to where parties are seated.

BZZZT! Wrong answer!...and here I thought you knew everything! They deviated this year from what was otherwise customary...

Quote
This was a last minute change of plan, and in contrast to last year, when the foursome loitered, together, but each separately inspecting the fascinating detail of their shoes, in the entrance hall of Westminster Abbey, and then walked behind the queen, who arrives last, to their seats.

What would you deem appropriate?  Knocking down chairs in the church to give Harry and Meghan a full on bear hug?    Should Meghan go sit in Charles' lap à law Trump/Ivanka?

Not exactly. Maybe wear a black face and just blame it on *being born living a privileged life...* that should work for a certain masses.

You pretend you know but definitely haven't the slightest idea of any of these situations, no?

]We don't know if they saw each other earlier, either.

No. Apparently, just you.

 
A cursory acknowledgement is normal.

Nyet! :(
Quote
Anthropologists could have had a field day with the ensuing dance of the royals that unfolded. Edward bobbed up in his seat to greet his important nephew, Meghan and Harry remained superglued to theirs.

Harry appeared to say, ‘Hello’, while Meghan smiled, mini-waved and mouthed a greeting at the couple. The camera angle obscured William and Kate’s response, but it appeared to be sufficiently non-effusive for Meghan to immediately turn to her husband for social rescue (LMAO!)

A conversation stand-off then ensued: William and Kate turned in their seats and spoke to Edward and Sophie, Edward and Sophie spoke to Harry and Meghan – but William and Kate and Harry and Meghan made no conversation with each other. (double that LMAO!)

Yes, that’s right: two brothers and their wives, involved in one of the most public falling-outs of the year, couldn’t bring themselves to even pretend to say:

“How are you doing?”

“Yeah alright man,” and smile.

That is literally all it would have taken to nudge the narrative onto a different trajectory.

If this is what things look like when this lot are on their best behavior, imagine being a fly on the wall when all hell broke loose between them in Kensington Palace….

I doubt you will see any tell alls.  I would hazard a guess part of Charles' continued funding to the tune of $3 million a years is an airtight NDA.  MM is already breaking that with her leaks to the press, but mostly about minor things.

At least you said 'guess' this time.
Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: msmob on March 10, 2020, 12:47:56 PM
Quote from: GQBlues link=topic=24101.msg528761#msg528761 [quote author=GQBlues date=1583862319
But of course YOU know exactly what happened.

Priceless ..sound of whooshing irony passing over head



Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: GQBlues on March 10, 2020, 01:08:03 PM
Priceless ..sound of whooshing irony passing over head

There he goes talking about himself again.

:devil:
Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: GQBlues on March 10, 2020, 04:56:54 PM
Holy Commy Dictatorship, Batman!!!

Quote
This rule applies to you and Kate Middleton! Well, sort of…If one day, you have the honor of having dinner with the Queen, be aware that as soon as she finishes her meal, everyone at the table has to put down the cutlery and stop eating immediately.

LMAO!

Poor Kate! No wonder Meghan ain't having none of these BS! Talk about being sticks in the mud! (http://www.buzznet.com/2018/08/the-rules-kate-middleton-has-to-follow-prove-princess-life-is-not-easy/?utm_source=tb&utm_medium=msn-msn-home-tb&utm_term=What+Kate+Gave+Up+To+Become+A+Royal-https%3A%2F%2Fconsole.brax-cdn.com%2Fcreatives%2Fb86bbc0b-1fab-4ae3-9b34-fef78c1a7488%2Frkm-2-blue-1_1000x600_e0fb225a9dd9ddbe4117a90e694b522f.png&utm_content=2879530538&utm_campaign=2009195-tb&edge=1)
Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: msmob on March 10, 2020, 09:46:27 PM
GQBlues proves he is unable to differentiate fact from fiction.. AGAIN ..



Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: Boethius on March 12, 2020, 12:25:42 PM
Oh, that's just funny! Not according Allred and her clients. But of course YOU know exactly what happened.

I never claimed to know what happened.  However, there is no evidence that girls Epstein procured were prepubescent.   If you have evidence to the contrary, post it. 

FTR, I think Andrew is sleazy and from all accounts, thick as a plank.  Assuming he had sex with Virginia Giuffre (the only woman who has come forward), she was 17.  Still wrong, IMHO and demonstrates a definite lack of character, but on this forum, that and slightly older teen aged "women" are considered "fair game" to many middle aged and older AM.  Had Andrew been posting here in 2000, he would have been virtually "high fived", even admired, by many posters for his "luck" and ability to procure very young "flesh". My, my, how the worm has turned.

Quote
BZZZT! Wrong answer!...and here I thought you knew everything! They deviated this year from what was otherwise customary...

They have never deviated from the custom of how the service is conducted.  All that was different this year was entering the procession, and generally, the sixth in line to the throne would not be in that procession.  Have you watched past services?  They are broadcast in Canada, as it is a Commonwealth country.

Quote
You pretend you know but definitely haven't the slightest idea of any of these situations, no?

I never stated I did.  I stated we don't know what happened before their public appearance.  Evidently, in "scoring points", your reading comprehension disappears.
 
This post was composed without the aid of google.
Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: GQBlues on March 26, 2020, 04:54:10 AM
Heh! Carlotta tested positive the day after meeting with mama lizzy.

😢
Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: GQBlues on March 26, 2020, 04:56:02 AM
I never claimed to know what happened.  However, there is no evidence that girls Epstein procured were prepubescent.   If you have evidence to the contrary, post it. 

FTR, I think Andrew is sleazy and from all accounts, thick as a plank.  Assuming he had sex with Virginia Giuffre (the only woman who has come forward), she was 17.  Still wrong, IMHO and demonstrates a definite lack of character, but on this forum, that and slightly older teen aged "women" are considered "fair game" to many middle aged and older AM.  Had Andrew been posting here in 2000, he would have been virtually "high fived", even admired, by many posters for his "luck" and ability to procure very young "flesh". My, my, how the worm has turned.

They have never deviated from the custom of how the service is conducted.  All that was different this year was entering the procession, and generally, the sixth in line to the throne would not be in that procession.  Have you watched past services?  They are broadcast in Canada, as it is a Commonwealth country.

I never stated I did.  I stated we don't know what happened before their public appearance.  Evidently, in "scoring points", your reading comprehension disappears.
 
This post was composed without the aid of google.

BZZZT! Wrong Answer. Too much speculation.
Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: msmob on March 26, 2020, 05:47:07 AM
Heh! Carlotta tested positive the day after meeting with mama lizzy.

😢

'Fake news'

He hasn't met with Mama, that recently

Now IF you'd asked, " How come Charles got tested?" ( when Medical staff are self-isolating and could be working ) ... well, you'd actually have HAD a point ...


Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: GQBlues on March 26, 2020, 07:44:20 AM
The 'date' of testing is inconsequential if Carlotta was already *viral* when the mama-meet took place...oh wait, that's a bit redundant.

It was also reported that he's self-isolated, and is quarantined from good ol' Camilla. LMAO. Funny, I thought she was just a prop all these years, and coronavirus wasn't necessary to induce isolation from each other.

As for why he jumped the line...so what, one Carlotta is worth an entire population of English folks. Die for the king and all that silly stuff...
Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: msmob on March 26, 2020, 08:22:08 AM
As ever, the his getting a test ( when others more needy miss out )  went over your head..

Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: GQBlues on March 26, 2020, 08:23:55 AM
No it didn't. Peons had always been insignificant in your way of life over there...Carlotta is *royalty*.
Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: Boethius on March 26, 2020, 11:18:01 AM
BZZZT! Wrong Answer. Too much speculation.


Other than were Andrew posting here about his experience, he'd be high fived by many members, nothing I posted is speculation.  As to that particular point, given there were, and are, middle aged men here who met and even married, teenaged girls, I happen to believe that part of the post was (and is) accurate.  17, 18, 19?  Is there really that large a difference?


This post was composed without the aid of google.
Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: GQBlues on May 15, 2020, 07:40:24 AM
What a totally inept, royal emotional sap this bozo really is...he's breaking down living in a luxury villa during the 'lockdown'. LMAO!

~ Prince Harry is feeling “rudderless” as he struggles to adapt to life under lockdown in a new country where he has few friends, it has been claimed today....He has been telling friends that he still can’t believe this has happened. He can’t believe his life has been turned upside down. ~

The dude had been spoon fed all his life and now a few months of independence, which he sought, he's 'rudderless'?? WTF. If this bozo for real?

This is a 'prince'? Are you guys freaking kidding me? He's more like a spineless little twit!! LA is gonna eat yah up, man if you don't start acting a dude!!! Man up!!!

http://www.msn.com/en-us/lifestyle/royals/prince-harry-feels-rudderless-and-doesnt-have-friends-in-la-source-says/ar-BB142AI7?li=BBnbcA0
Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: msmob on May 15, 2020, 08:55:34 AM
I wonder what 'friend' mentioned Harry's 'feelings' for our resident regurgitator of 'gossip' to dig up ?..

Did anyone check to see if his 'protection is coming out of your pockets ? ;)
Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: GQBlues on May 15, 2020, 09:11:46 AM
He doesn't have a 'friend' in LA...Rudderless and all! LMAO!

I'm beginning to think this seems rather typical for male citizens of the UK.

Your prince is a twit! Reminds me of Hector's juvenile brother Paris, the wimp! Disgraced and destroyed the kingdom of Troy just for a 'lay'.
Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: msmob on May 15, 2020, 09:26:15 AM
 :tmi:
He doesn't have a 'friend' in LA...

Oh, I'm sure they do .. they are just finding out what a real friend doesn't do ... that's GOSSIP


I'm beginning to think this seems rather typical for male citizens of the UK.

IF, you were beginning to think, at all, that would be a start .. ;)

Plenty of UK citizens live in California...  Rod Stewart ? loads of ex-music and film stars and nearly every 'villain' and 'bad hero' ' is a Brit !


Your prince is a twit!

He speaks highly of you .. ( I doubt he cares )
Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: GQBlues on May 15, 2020, 09:49:22 AM
~...Harry, 35, does not “blame Meghan,” but can’t shake a “sense that he might have been better protected if he was still in the Army.”...~

LMAO! I think the Royal Rudderless may well be a *switch hitter*, too. He really loves his army buddies. :devil:

Such a twit!
Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: msmob on May 15, 2020, 10:38:50 AM
GQB, isn't exactly au fait with reality around him, so how can I explain that the 'lost soul' has a BIG following with current and ex military personnel in many nations, due to his 'Invictus' project.

I will ensure GQB gets the 'gig' at an after dinner speech when he 'outs' Harry...

 
Title: Re: UK Royal Family privacy and Canada
Post by: GQBlues on May 15, 2020, 10:44:13 AM
I'm certain his army 'buddies' know exactly to *fill* his lonesome state. :devil:

Poor lil' Harry....so miserable in LA.

Closet....coming...out....soon....next....chapter