I am very afraid for the future if my country!!
They have a Czar/Tsar in Russia. If Putin leaves office he gets killed or getsI though Putin kills all his enemies? Where do those powerful ones come from?
thrown in jail. His enemies are too powerful and too corrupt to let him live.
I am very afraid for the future if my country!!Considering you show an American flag, I doubt Putin is going to be president there within the next 10 years. However after that he might decide to come over and run.
Considering you show an American flag, I doubt Putin is going to be president there within the next 10 years. However after that he might decide to come over and run.
I am very afraid for the future if my country!!
I was not implying Russia. I am afraid for the future if my country under these leftist demigods in charge now and the insane policies they are putting in place. Destroying everything my country is made of. Could care less what Putin does in Russia, that’s their problem.All I can say to comfort you is that these leftists would be called right-wing in Europe. And we are still alive.
You are watching a slow takeover of our country conducted by corrupt people. I never thought I'd live in a time that would happen. Even some Democrats get it. Democrat voting Charles Barkley said on tv that the politicians are the one causing race wars in their attempt to divide and conquer us.
http://twitter.com/runBMC57/status/1378435984707133445 (http://twitter.com/runBMC57/status/1378435984707133445)
If you're reading the news about the cop Derick Chauvin court case, the media is reporting in a way that makes Chauvin look guilty but I seen the evidence and he will most likely be found not guilty and our politicians will tell cops to stand down and allow the destruction of our cities again this summer because people are going to be upset with the juries ruling. I'm not Nostradamus. Like Charles Barkley, I know they want to divide and conquer us to solidify their power.
Right On, Bruddah!!! CB's always been awesome, and was never afraid to tell it like it is. He once said publicly many black folks cry victim to hide their laziness. The majority of them are hard working folks. It is unfortunate the lazy few are the ones the media gives coverage to.
America IS awesome without these lobbyists-sucking clowns off DC. Start with that Chicago stooge...
Derick's an idiot. Regardless of whether or not Floyd was high on drugs, what he did was criminal. Jail is where he belongs.
And how many years of law enforcement experience do you have to back that up? I have 25 years worth!!!
All I can say to comfort you is that these leftists would be called right-wing in Europe. And we are still alive.
I thought Putin kills all his enemies? Where do those powerful ones come from?
If you're reading the news about the cop Derick Chauvin court case
GQ, the fake news media is setting people up to be angry....
Whether it's first degree, 2nd or 3rd...George is dead. Derek is principally, or contributory, the caused of it.
Whether it's first degree, 2nd or 3rd...George is dead. Derek is principally, or contributory, the caused of it.If the officer gets off, there should be massive protests. He killed the man, and looking at the totality of circumstances it was with intent. We shall see if the jury agrees.
You are watching a slow takeover of our country conducted by corrupt people. I never thought I'd live in a time that would happen. Even some Democrats get it. Democrat voting Charles Barkley said on tv that the politicians are the one causing race wars in their attempt to divide and conquer us.It's not just democrats, the US in general tries to foment outrage across the globe when it we think it is in our financial interests to do so.
Floyd's passenger in the car took the 5th. He's Floyd's drug dealer and Floyd had enough drugs in him to kill a horse or 3 humans. Normally it's the drug dealer that gets charged with murder if they overdose a customer.
Autopsy performed said Floyd didn't have any injuries to his body or neck and didn't die of asphyxiation....
If the officer gets off, there should be massive protests. He killed the man, and looking at the totality of circumstances it was with intent. We shall see if the jury agrees.
Fathertime!
Have someone give you a rear naked choke...see how fast your heart beats instantly even after 20 seconds...Your system will shutdown before one minute is over. You'll be out cold shortly after. If the choke continues, you're dead meat.
The toughest part in these hearings, just as it were in the OJ and Rodney King hearings, it has to be proven beyond reasonable doubt.
Him and his regime is constantly stealing and pulling the noose tighter andSo far the Russians have more than enough freedom, and you are unable to name the enemies you claim he has.As for Putin being personally responsible for everything in Russia, perhaps realise there are quite a few more people living there.
tighter around Russian freedom. He keeps harassing countries and people
around him. He will never run out of powerful enemies. He will always
push for more power and more money. He will kill more journalists
he will jail more adversaries. He can't stop
So far the Russians have more than enough freedomI disagree with this. A lot of Russians are wary of criticizing their government. I have personally witnessed this, and it's among people young enough to not be influenced by the USSR. Ukrainians, OTOH, have no problem criticizing their government. Some of that may be that Russians are better governed, however, the ones I know steer clear of any criticism, because they don't know what the personal consequences will be. That doesn't sound like "more than enough freedom" to me.
I disagree with this. A lot of Russians are wary of criticizing their government. I have personally witnessed this, and it's among people young enough to not be influenced by the USSR. Ukrainians, OTOH, have no problem criticizing their government. Some of that may be that Russians are better governed, however, the ones I know steer clear of any criticism, because they don't know what the personal consequences will be. That doesn't sound like "more than enough freedom" to me.Is criticizing a government your measure of freedom?
and you are unable to name the enemies you claim he has.
Is criticizing a government your measure of freedom?
So far the Russians have more than enough freedom
I recall an episode where a US diplomat killed someone overseas in a similar situation, and the US fought tooth and nail to keep her from paying a consequence.
If you daughter is run down by a rich drunk Dutch official's son will the son
get to get away free? How free are you if you can't keep your children safe?
Despite the high threshold, have confidence he will either be found guilty or the jury will be hung by one/two people. I think the chance is very very low that he will be found not guilty.
The toughest part in these hearings, just as it were in the OJ and Rodney King hearings, it has to be proven beyond reasonable doubt.
Freedom to keep their businesses? Freedom from graft? Freedom
to get equal protection under the law? Freedom to keep their inventions?
Freedom to petition the government with their grievances? Freedom to
peaceably assemble? Freedom to have single digit inflation? Freedom
to elect who they want?
Shadow,I asked to name those powerful enemies that you say are a threat, not a list of clowns.
Next time ask me to name some of his enemies rather than say that
I can't do it.
I can't name any Putin enemies?!
Says who? Freedom to keep their businesses? Freedom from graft? FreedomDream on , yup Russia is still USSR.
to get equal protection under the law? Freedom to keep their inventions?
Freedom to petition the government with their grievances? Freedom to
peaceably assemble? Freedom to have single digit inflation? Freedom
to elect who they want?
Whoops, they don't have ANY of those freedoms that the Dutch, Canadians
and Americans have, but in your mind they have enough?
If you daughter is run down by a rich drunk Dutch official's son will the sonHe would get away free because
get to get away free? How free are you if you can't keep your children safe?
The ability to criticize your government openly and without fear, is a measure of freedom, unless you want to get philosophical about it (i.e., as long as you have the ability to think what you wish, you are free, even if you live in a totalitarian state).Now I understand why the US has such a bad government. It is all about people feeling free.
And how many years of law enforcement experience do you have to back that up? I have 25 years worth!!!
The last two days of this trial showcased testimonies from 4-5 of highly-qualified medical professionals that came to the same conclusion about George Floyd's cause of death.
Now I understand why the US has such a bad government. It is all about people feeling free.
BillyB-
The official cause of death was cardiopulmonary arrest brought about by (hypoxia - low oxygen). It was classified as 'homicide' because the mechanism of death was caused by the action of another. There was no need to have an *intent* in a 'homicidal' declaration in any death certificate. The terminal event was Derek's restraining and prolonged kneeling on George's neck and shoulder - 'the action of another'. This was explained on the trial.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/homicide (http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/homicide)
Defined: Homicide is when one human being causes the death of another. Not all homicide is murder (http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/murder), as some killings are manslaughter (http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/manslaughter), and some are lawful, such as when justified by an affirmative defense (http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/affirmative_defense), like insanity (http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/insanity_defense) or self-defense.
This is also largely why they changed the original charge of 1st degree to a lesser 2nd degree murder. Simply because proving 'intent' would be nearly impossible unless they have solid evidence, and any historical reasons, to believe Derek had ambition of killing George Floyd prior to this terminal event.
I recall an episode where a US diplomat killed someone overseas in a similar situation, and the US fought tooth and nail to keep her from paying a consequence.Wasn't the diplomat in question in fact actually her husband?
Now I understand why the US has such a bad government. It is all about people feeling free.Not a bad government..just crappy people running it [into the ground]
I know you are not. But the principle is the same. If freedom means criticizing the government than having a bad government contributes to freedom.To me freedom is a very different concept, it is the ability to act freely without interference. And considering the level of interference from government and other service we have here in Europe I do not call it to be free.
I'm not American. The concept of being free to speak one's mind against government was established in Europe before the USA was established.
I asked to name those powerful enemies that you say are a threat, not a list of clowns.
Russia is still USSR.
Our system is just as corrupted as any other.
Merkel doesn't think this mass mobilization is going to be a training exercise.
BillyB-
The official cause of death was cardiopulmonary arrest brought about by (hypoxia - low oxygen). It was classified as 'homicide' because the mechanism of death was caused by the action of another. There was no need to have an *intent* in a 'homicidal' declaration in any death certificate. The terminal event was Derek's restraining and prolonged kneeling on George's neck and shoulder - 'the action of another'. This was explained on the trial.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/homicide (http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/homicide)
Defined: Homicide is when one human being causes the death of another. Not all homicide is murder (http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/murder), as some killings are manslaughter (http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/manslaughter), and some are lawful, such as when justified by an affirmative defense (http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/affirmative_defense), like insanity (http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/insanity_defense) or self-defense.
This is also largely why they changed the original charge of 1st degree to a lesser 2nd degree murder. Simply because proving 'intent' would be nearly impossible unless they have solid evidence, and any historical reasons, to believe Derek had ambition of killing George Floyd prior to this terminal event.
Low oxygen and slow breathing could've been caused by the drugs Floyd took. Many who overdose die slowly, not instantly. The drugs Floyd took does restrict breathing.
2nd degree murder requires 'intent'. Chauvin didn't intend to kill Floyd. He called for medical attention twice and he certainly wouldn't kills someone in front of cameras and an audience.
http://www.hg.org/legal-articles/murder-charges-in-minnesota-43141#:~:text=Second%20degree%20murder%20can%20be,intense%20emotional%20response%20or%20impulse (http://www.hg.org/legal-articles/murder-charges-in-minnesota-43141#:~:text=Second%20degree%20murder%20can%20be,intense%20emotional%20response%20or%20impulse).
Of course the autopsy said homicide. Homicide doesn't mean a crime happened and if it did, the homicide may have been committed by Floyd's drug dealer so that leaves 'doubt' in the juries minds that Chauvin caused the manslaughter partially or not at all. To find someone guilty, they must be guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
a) a person causes the death of a human being, without intent, while committing or attempting to commit a felony offense other that criminal sexual conduct in the first or second degree with force or violence or a drive by shooting...and/or,
b) a person causes the death of another without intent 'while intentionally inflicting or attempting to inflict bodily harm upon the victim, when the perpetrator is restrained under an order for protection''
George no longer had a pulse, he was no longer breathing, he was motionless and had already discharged frothy sputum. The other officer, twice, checked his pulse found nothing, asked Derek maybe they should ease the restraint and flip him over, Derek refused and continued his actions.
There definitely wasn't an order of protection and Chauvin wasn't committing a felony. Let's say you fire a gun into a crowd of people which is a felony but you didn't intentionally want to kill anybody but you did, then they can charge you with unintentional murder.
I asked my nurse friend about this and he said the drugs in Floyd system can restrict breathing and the amount he took can kill him.
Chuavin was the officer in charge and he is allowed discretion and doesn't need to flip Floyd over just because other officers who have a few days experience on the job asked him if Floyd should be flipped on the side.
The Minneapolis prosecutor's office is playing to the crowd and not doing what's right. Let's say I sell a lethal amount of drugs to a guy. You get in a fight with him. He's on the ground and you stop the fight. Like Chauvin, you call the ambulance, not once, but twice and after 5 minutes in the ambulance the guy dies and you get charged with second degree murder. Your attorney finds out I'm the guy that sold the drugs and you tell the prosecutor he should be going after me but the mob wants to hang you so I plead the 5th on the stand so I don't incriminate myself. Witnesses go on the stand saying you delivered the deadly blow that was the straw that broke the camels back.
Watch the expert witnesses the defense puts up. They will put doubt in the minds of the jury that Chauvin is responsible for Floyd's death. I've been on juries where it's a slam dunk the guy is guilty. There's too much doubt here Chauvin killed Floyd or even wanted to kill him.
OK, so now you understand a second degree murder charge DOES NOT require 'intent'.
George no longer had a pulse way before the ambulance arrived.
It requires intent unless there's a felony involved such as shooting a gun into a crowd of people with no intention of killing anybody. Why do you think Chauvin committed a felony with all those cameras on him?
..
So you believe a rookie cop's evaluation over the medical experts in the ambulance who said Floyd was going into cardiac arrest....
Just because someone can't find a pulse doesn't mean there isn't one.
..Most, if not all jurors will have doubt Chauvin killed Floyd. Riots are coming. Opportunities to get some free Nikes and big screen tvs are coming!
3) He clearly caused the death of George Floyd. As Dr. Thomas concluded, she had never been involved in any investigation or cases that had so much evidentiary materials as this case do. Materials that she clearly testified, under oath and based on her medical broad experience - along with other 4 highly qualified medical professionals who testified in this case - and in great details; that confirmed George died due to cardiopulmonary arrest due to hypoxia as a result of the restraining by the officers.
Have you ever done jury duty?
There will be experts from both sides of the fence testifying. You're getting one side of the story. I believe the medical expert who done the actual autopsy is testifying or already done testifying. Check him out.
I'm not following the case because the video and audio evidence I seen last year is enough for me to know Floyd died in the ambulance and Chauvin used an approved police department method of restraining a suspect so his actions aren't a felony. If Floyd wasn't on a 3X lethal dose of drugs, he'd be alive today. If the Minneapolis justice system was remotely fair, they'd be going after the drug dealer but his skin color prevents them from doing so.
Show us the video or the evidence where the medics declared George died on the ambulance.
I already provided the dispatcher tape where the ambulance asked for backup because Floyd was going into cardiac arrest. Floyd may have survived his heart attack in the ambulance and later died in the hospital. Doesn't really matter. Bottom line is Floyd didn't die under Chuavin's knee because a dead man can't go into cardiac arrest. As for your CNN video, they are going to present the most damning testimony. The other testimony will benefit Chauvin because it will leave doubt in the jurors minds that Chauvin killed Floyd.
I thought he was dead
just watch and listen to the video.
The initial call was Code 2 (no siren or lights). It was eventually changed to Code 3.
Thanks to the officer in charge, Chauvin. Chauvin upgraded the emergency to Code 3. Chauvin's history is going to be examined. He may have a reputation for handling thugs just fine. Never any problems or deaths. Or maybe his fellow officers will testify all 200+ thugs Chauvin has handled in his 19 years on the force were with 'lights out' methods using blunt trauma to the head or choke holds that make them pass out every time but I doubt it.
It bears no relevance to what happened, and his actions, on May 25, 2020. He's not on trial t what he has done prior to May 25, 2020. He's on trial on what he did May 25, 2020.
I'm a busy guy trying to save the world from a deadly virus and experimental vaccines and you made me watch an 11 minute video pertaining to a guy who's already dead! I'm not surprised at the prosecutors questions and testimony from the medic. I need to hear the defense attorney's questions too. Seems like the media only wants to report one side of the story. Why did the medics call dispatch reporting Floyd was in cardiac arrest and need fire medics for backup 5 minutes after they took custody of Floyd from the cops? Looking at the video and hearing audio that there wasn't a pulse, we can all assume Floyd was dead under Chauvin's knee but truth is Floyd went into cardiac arrest in the ambulance.
Now why would Putin waste his time signing a law for just two more terms? What’s wrong with say 4?
That's two expert witnesses charging $350.00/hr that went out the window. The defense should find out if they can get a refund.
$350/hr is cheap.
I was recently involved with an auto injury case. Our attorney had arranged for a surgeon to testify. The surgeon's expert witness fees for testimony would have been $15,000 per day (or any part thereof). The insurance company settled, thus preempting a trial and testimony.
I’m in the wrong biz. Engineering consultants maxes out at $200.00/hr.
From my recent experience, the auto injury claims "racket" would be a wise career choice in our ever more litigious society.
Most of the smartest university graduates choose a career to become a lawyer, MBA, or medical doctor. Those who chose the first two achieved far greater financial success than those who chose becoming a medical doctor.
Most of the smartest university graduates choose a career to become a lawyer, MBA, or medical doctor. Those who chose the first two achieved far greater financial success than those who chose becoming a medical doctor.
Not true at all concerning the financial success.