"Mittens is not a credible source."

why?   cuz he's anti-Trump?
a lot more credible then "he whose name must not be mentioned"

what he was referring to was 'this'

Citizens United v. FEC
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_United_v._FEC#Dissent

political donations are 'free speech'
all the animals are equal you see
but some are MUCH more equal than others
money can't buy you love, but it can buy you all the politicians you want on both sides of the isle

here's a CPA 'certified Political Accountant" view
http://www.opensecrets.org/elections-overview/biggest-donors

rich people all donate to whatever party, for the same reason...
to influence the party, as a form of 'wealth protection'

money turns our congress from the 'house of commons' into the 'house of lords'
not too good for the 'commoners' now is it?

Bill, is this video below, why yur a republican?
http://twitter.com/i/status/1734633407081033784
cuz you want America to be a theocracy like Iran, but just with a different religion?

I didn't leave the party, the party left me

It goes the opposite way. Upside down and backwards again. Bill Mahr, Joe Rogan Tulsi
Gabbard all left the Democrats because of woke crap.


The Democrats Begging Their Party to Ditch the Activist Left
http://time.com/6332506/democrats-2024-activist-left-elections/

billionaires donate to both sides, it's called hedging

You said big corporations not Billionaires. Show me a dollar that Bill Gates, Bezos,
Larry Page, Mark Zuckerberg, George Soros, Larry Ellison, Michael Dell or Warren
Buffet donated to the right, they didn't hedge. Most billionaires are Dem's only a
very few are Republican.

Most Big Corporations are woke and give to woke causes or suffer the rath of the left.

Here is a thought I thought I would throw on here for discussion.

What about instead of countries people grouped together in regions of the world with the same or similar politics/ideology.

Let's face it people can argue to their hearts content about politics and how things should be but people rarely if ever change their point of view. In theory it means that in many countries are many people living opposed to the politics of that country/government. So in that respect under conditions they would rather not do so.

So what if instead the world was split up by different geo-political regions.

So Feminists would have their own region, Male Chauvinists another region, Racists another region, Multiculturalists another, Capitalists another, Socialists another and so on and so forth.

Then people could go and live in the region that aligned with their politics/ideology etc, so for them live in their paradise without being subjected to the whim of politics/ideology they are opposed to.

. . . I decided that I was not going to send her back, so I drove her to Las Vegas and married her.

A form of 'kid-napping?'