Putin in Ukraine to Celebrate a Christian Anniversary

[lordtiberius]

Frankly, LT, all these discussion of religion should be moved to a separate section. There is nothing wrong with religion, I love and practice Orthodoxy, and it is true that it is important enough that men seeking a RW/UW should know her views prior to marriage. But it is counter productive to lace every topic with this one.

The topic is a religious topic about the practice of religion and now there is a call to censor speech because of a religious opinion. 

This display speaks for itself

[lordtiberius]

The topic is about religion.  Religious opinions are not allowed?  Threats and censorship does not win the argument - maybe in Russia it does.

[SANDRO43]

The topic is about religion.

Yes, and about Putin's foreign politics.

Religious opinions are not allowed?

Of course they are, until their obsessive repetition crosses the threshold of opinion and becomes propaganda:

You agree to refrain from posting any ethnic, racial, religious, or political commentary which is not directly related to the theme of this site

Threats and censorship does not win the argument - maybe in Russia it does.

I am not trying to win any argument, you might have noticed that I took no part in the discussion of this thread.

I am just warning you of the likely consequences if you insist on repeating your apparently pet idea - enough is enough. Did I make myself sufficiently clear?

[lordtiberius]

Yes, and about Putin's foreign politics.Of course they are, until their obsessive repetition crosses the threshold of opinion and becomes propaganda:I am not trying to win any argument, you might have noticed that I took no part in the discussion of this thread.

I am just warning you of the likely consequences if you insist on repeating your apparently pet idea - enough is enough. Did I make myself sufficiently clear?

Maybe pigheaded intolerance deserves moderation, maybe anticlerical hate should be censored.  If one is not interested in ideas, maybe he should come up with superior ideas.

[SANDRO43]

Maybe pigheaded intolerance deserves moderation,

Yes, as well as pigheaded, repetitive harping on the same subject:  .

maybe anticlerical hate should be censored.

Possibly so, when obnoxiously manifest . Do you feel you were subjected to that and, if yes, when and by whom?

If one is not interested in ideas, maybe he should come up with superior ideas.

Rather contradictory, isn't it? How could one not interested in ideas come up with other ideas, regardless if superior or inferior?

[lordtiberius]

Yes, as well as pigheaded, repetitive harping on the same subject:  . Possibly so, when obnoxiously manifest . Do you feel you were subjected to that and, if yes, when and by whom?Rather contradictory, isn't it? How could one not interested in ideas come up with other ideas, regardless if superior or inferior?

so full of hate, you need to loosen up

[SANDRO43]

so full of hate, you need to loosen up

Hate for you ? You're grossly overestimating the possible effect of your words on my emotional state .

LT, I find discussing with you excruciatingly boring and mostly pointless, therefore I'll beg to withdraw from such a useless exercise.

However, my previous warning stands, regardless of whether you find it a show of spiteful anti-clerical censorship - in which case you should join the long list of martyrs of the faith .

[lordtiberius]

Hate for you ? You're grossly overestimating the possible effect of your words on my emotional state .

LT, I find discussing with you excruciatingly boring and mostly pointless, therefore I'll beg to withdraw from such a useless exercise.

However, my previous warning stands, regardless of whether you find it a show of spiteful anti-clerical censorship - in which case you should join the long list of martyrs of the faith .

You are going to threaten me over the internet? 

Ok buddy

I find you equally entertaining and think of you often.  Too bad I am not gay

[cc3]

From one veteran to another: try to retain some semblance of connectedness to the basic mission of this forum, appreciation of and desire for women of eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union, This is not a theological debate/missionizing forum. In fact, since most of us with FSU committed partners, have enjoyed pre-marital intimate relations with our fiancees/wives, the point could be made that extremely observant Catholics, such as you, should shun this forum due to its being populated with such a large population of very happy and dedicated mortal sinners.

[Muzh]

 

Please don't stop!!

[lordtiberius]

Reviving a dead thread to impose a speech code must mean you havr some aubconscious conflict you need to resolve.  If you dont like the topic dont bring it up.

we all got to go some time. 

[Muzh]

I see you missed me while I went on vacation. 
 
I also see you are having some conflicts with proper punctuation and spelling.
 
Anything that deals with supertitious beliefs is interesting to me so I would have some difficulty staying away.

[SANDRO43]

I also see you are having some conflicts with proper punctuation and spelling.

Who hasn't :

Anything that deals with supertitious beliefs is interesting to me so I would have some difficulty staying away.

you havr some aubconscious

[lordtiberius]

Who hasn't :

thats awesome!

[Muzh]

Who hasn't :

Sandro, you the MAN!!

Superstitious.

[TomT]

This has to be the most humorous topic since Paul Casini!

[SANDRO43]

Sandro, you the MAN!! Superstitious.

thats awesome!

Once an editor, always an editor . Actually, those were more typos/finger checks than spelling errors:

Muzh  (supertitious/superstitious): he probably thought he'd hit the missing S and went quicly from R to neighbouring T on the keyboard.

LT (havr/have, aubconscious/subconscious): similar case, he hit R rather than neighbouring E, and A rather than neighbouring S.

Typos can be easily avoided by turning Spell Check on . However this will not cure some real spelling errors that I see frequently here like, to mention just a few:

- Advise (verb) vs. advice (noun)
- It's (contracted verb) vs. its (possessive adjective)