It appears you have not registered with our community. To register please click here ...

!!

Welcome to Russian Women Discussion - the most informative site for all things related to serious long-term relationships and marriage to a partner from the Former Soviet Union countries!

Please register (it's free!) to gain full access to the many features and benefits of the site. Welcome!

+-

Author Topic: Unmarried people outnumber legally married people for the first time  (Read 5265 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Maple Leaf

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 14
  • Gender: Male
I heard on the news some interesting data about the recent Canadian census.  They go into a lot of detail about the rise in same sex marriages, and single households, and common law arrangements. 

Here is the link:

http://www.statcan.ca/Daily/English/070912/d070912a.htm

I always wondered if there was some transformation of women not wanting to get married anymore because of further empowerment with having greater success with their careers, etc.  The more time spent climbing the corporate ladder, the less time spent searching for their soul mate. 

It just shows times have changed for a lot of Canadians.  The stats on married couples versus unmarried couples is what really shows the new trend.  Never mind the increase in same sex unions, etc.   

This finding is what I found most disturbing:

Unmarried people outnumber legally married people for the first time
For the first time, the census enumerated more unmarried people aged 15 and over than legally married people.

In 2006, more than one-half (51.5%) of the adult population were unmarried, that is, never married, divorced, separated or widowed, compared with 49.9% five years earlier. Conversely, only 48.5% of persons aged 15 and over were legally married in 2006, down from 50.1% in 2001.

Twenty years earlier, 38.6% of the population aged 15 and over were unmarried, while 61.4% were married.


Now I know why some of us are seeking more family oriented women outside of Canada.  We are finding it difficult to find the right one with this new shift in family values and materialistic mentality with some of these women.  This report just fuels my fire to seek someone special in the FSU. :)
« Last Edit: September 12, 2007, 07:21:46 PM by Maple Leaf »

Offline ScottinCrimea

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3573
  • Gender: Male
Re: Unmarried people outnumber legally married people for the first time
« Reply #1 on: September 12, 2007, 07:35:38 PM »
I think it's really a product of improved home heating in Canada.  With those Canadian winters, if you don't have a good furnace, you gotta find someone to cuddle with for warmth.

Offline Khankrumthebulgar

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9
  • Gender: Male
Re: Unmarried people outnumber legally married people for the first time
« Reply #2 on: December 26, 2007, 06:16:12 AM »
We are seeing a similar trend in the US. Where cohabitation is growing in favor over Marriage. And where large numbers of Men are joining the Marriage Strike refusing to Marry. Due to the onerous Laws and treatments by Family Courts. How Bad are the Family Courts in the US. Here is an article by Dr. Stephen Baskerville.

TOTALITARIANISM IN AMERICA

 

 

 

By Stephen Baskerville, Ph.D
December 18, 2007
NewsWithViews.com

Mass incarcerations without trial or charge; forced confessions; children forcibly separated from their parents with no reasons given; doctored hearing transcripts and falsified court records; evidence fabricated against the innocent; government agents entering the homes, examining private papers and personal effects, and seizing the property of citizens who are under no suspicion of legal wrongdoing; special courts created specifically to convict people who cannot be convicted in ordinary courts; children instructed to hate their parents by state functionaries: Is all this the Soviet Union in the 1930s or Communist China in the 1960s? Is this some novelist’s prognosticated dystopia? No, all this and more is routine in the United States today.

Among the most disturbing tales to come out of totalitarianism were the revelations of how both Nazi and Communist governments intruded into family life. The practice of governments dictating to parents what they could tell their children or using children as informers against their parents strikes us as chilling and unnatural. Yet similar practices are occurring in America today on a much more massive scale.

What we are talking about here is family law, a secretive political underworld of which few are aware until it strikes them. Parents summoned to family court discover that their children can be taken away, they can be forced to turn over all their property without explanation to government officials and their private clients, their future earnings can be confiscated to the point where they are unable to house or feed themselves, and they can be incarcerated without trial – all without any evidence or even charge that they have committed any actionable offense.

Unlike any other court, family courts do not even pretend that they are concerned with justice. They claim to determine “the best interest of the child” in divorces or other cases where one party is trying to take away someone else’s children. It is not necessary for the parent or parents whose children are targeted to have done anything legally wrong. Because most parents will spend any amount of money not to have their children taken away, these courts are very lucrative for lawyers and others who have developed a stake in taking control of other people’s children.

Traditionally, parents determined what was best for their own children. Now courts make that determination, over the objection of parents who have done nothing to forfeit the right to make it themselves. Once courts stop administering justice, they start administering injustice; there is no middle ground. Without justice, asked St. Augustine, “What are kingdoms but great robberies?”

Never before in human history has any government created a machinery whose primary purpose is to take children away from their parents. The Nazis and the Communists both did it. But it was not their principal aim. In America, we have created multibillion dollar machinery that exists for no other purpose.

The very idea of incarcerations without trial should be raising an outcry and have us demanding to know what is taking place in the world’s greatest democracy. Yet we hear nothing but silence from journalists, self-styled civil libertarians, and “human rights” groups.

Conservatives have allowed this to happen by credulously swallowing feminist propaganda about “deadbeat dads,” “pedophile” fathers, and wife-beaters. Having given the Left a monopoly as gatekeepers of the Bill of Rights and civil liberties, conservatives can hardly be surprised that they stand defenseless as the Left targets the family, fathers, Christianity, and other “patriarchal” institutions.

The erosion of our freedoms today is so gradual that few can find tangible points at which to oppose it. But here we have an attack on freedom that is much more direct than culture; it involves a direct assault on private family life by a dangerous government machinery. Until we wake up to the fact that radical feminism is a totalitarian ideology and that the family courts are executing the feminist Terror, we will never reverse the family’s decline.

Facile parallels with totalitarian dictatorships drawn by westerners who never experienced those terrors are a much-abused form of criticism and one to which conservatives are especially susceptible. Yet in this case, survivors of those dictatorships readily attest to the similarity. Bogumila and Jerzy Koss compare New York’s family courts to the bureaucratic tyrannies they knew in Poland. “As children we lived through Nazi horror, then through Communist occupation,” they write, “and now, in the United States, the ‘Land of the Free,’ we are persecuted by judicial tyranny.” But in contrast to Nazi and Stalinist regimes, which used children as one weapon among many, today in the Western democracies children and families have become the central object of government tyranny, and parents rather than dissidents have become the targets.

After experiencing American family law, Romanian dissident Mihai Muset gained a new perspective on totalitarian justice under communist dictator Nicolae Ceausescu, by whose regime he had been arrested for a protest. "I was sentenced to two months in prison," he recalls, "but at least I got to appear in court and talk to the judge. That's more than I got in family court."

Stephen Baskerville holds a PhD from the London School of Economics and is president of the American Coalition for Fathers and Children and ssistant professor of government at Patrick Henry College his book, Taken Into Custody: The War Against Fathers, Marriage, and the Family (Cumberland House, 2007).

Web Site: www.stephenbaskerville.net
 
E-Mail: sbaskerville@cox.net

 

+-RWD Stats

Members
Total Members: 8888
Latest: UA2006
New This Month: 0
New This Week: 0
New Today: 0
Stats
Total Posts: 545846
Total Topics: 20968
Most Online Today: 14199
Most Online Ever: 14199
(Today at 02:40:02 AM)
Users Online
Members: 7
Guests: 14200
Total: 14207

+-Recent Posts

Re: Operation White Panther by Patagonie
Yesterday at 12:12:59 PM

Re: Operation White Panther by Patagonie
Yesterday at 02:22:42 AM

Re: Operation White Panther by krimster2
May 06, 2025, 03:05:50 PM

Re: Operation White Panther by Patagonie
May 06, 2025, 02:56:46 PM

Re: Operation White Panther by krimster2
May 06, 2025, 02:35:06 PM

Re: Operation White Panther by Patagonie
May 06, 2025, 11:53:40 AM

Re: Operation White Panther by krimster2
May 06, 2025, 08:02:13 AM

Re: Operation White Panther by Patagonie
May 06, 2025, 07:08:51 AM

Re: Operation White Panther by Patagonie
May 06, 2025, 07:00:34 AM

What links do you have to the FSU? by Trenchcoat
May 06, 2025, 02:27:52 AM

Powered by EzPortal

create account