Just as the subtitle would have you expect, this author manages to mix a little fantasy with a few facts, and then dollops on a LOAD of sensationalistic horse manure, to arrive at what has to be the most outrageous, and inept publication on the topic ever produced. Is this what passes for a Law Review article these days?!?
Somebody at Emory ought to be ashamed - and I am not talking about the author. He ought to be committed.
Consider this:
Paragraph 1 is a brief recount of a highly-publicized account of abuse involving Natasha Fox.
Paragraph 2 begins a presentation of flawed data on sex trafficking.
Nowhere is there a nexus to connect the Fox case with sex trafficking - except, presumably, in the mind ofthe author.
Find on page 4 this quotation:
This Comment examines consumption in the mail-order bride industry as a normative explanation for the public health risks posed by sex trafficking.22 Sex trafficking, when deconstructed into an epidemic of consumption, produces a conceptual tool for understanding the health risks of the industry.23 Consumption exposes the international trafficking of women as a manifestation of necrophilia.24
What this author attempts to create is a path from international marriage to sex trafficking to necrophilia.
In other words - all of us are necrophiliacs.
Article attached.
For anyone feeling sufficiently outraged, here is the given contact information for the fantasizing juvenile who wrote this CoS (ask if you do not recognize the acronym).
Contact Information for DANIEL EPSTEIN (Contact Author)
Email address for DANIEL EPSTEIN
Emory University School of Law
1301 Clifton Road
Atlanta , GA 30322
United States
713-504-1785 (Phone)