Walking in Lugansk

[corncrowe]

It doesn't matter what you think Jon!  If we all thought like you we would all be getting scammed.
 
NO, Jon, the posting of these photos has nothing to do with an upcoming trip that is sold out and cannot accept any new guys, duhhh, sorry to shot down that one theory of yours that your trying to play up.
 
I told you Jon, if you don't want to see all these indecent women in short skirts, don't look at my post's. But I do feel sorry for you in that all the women you have personally met wearing short skirts have not been decent women. I guess maybe I am lucky or do a better job of picking women than you as most the women I have met wearing short skirts have been decent women.

Jack,

For the future, I will no longer recommend your agency.  Personally, I think you are borderline with your remarks.  Take this with a grain of salt, but this board as the "Chernovtsy Travel Board" will soon tire of you.  Would you like me to link all the threads from the past several years so readers can decide about your character?

Just a thought!

Jon

[corncrowe]

[user=134]Photo Guy[/user] wrote:

What does that mean? Women in short skirts are inferior to
young ones in traditional garb? Puritanical? Explain.

Photoguy,

If you are lost in the subject matter then there is indeed no hope for you. If you can't see the difference then how will you ever know the difference between a skirt and a decent woman?

It wasn't about the traditional wardrobe. It was simply to express that an agency owner is writing trips reports with women in short skirts to show "you" horny American men what's just over the rainbow.
Jon

Jon, your thinking is warped. Somehow, you view a photo of two women in short skirts as indecent because there's a good chance men will see them as being attractive, causing them to feel 'horny'. This is so in-line with warped feminism of the 80's. I really think you should focus on feminist types here in the States. Are you really saying these two women are 'skirts' are not decent? Really? Talk about judgmental. If they actually are typical examples of women in Lugansk, then so what? I don't think we should pretend sexual attraction is a bad thing. It's a good thing. ...Now promiscuity is a different matter. Doug[/quote]
Photoguy,

Would you kindly do us all a favor and repost your last girlfriend from Ukraine?  I just want to compare actual to expectations. 

Thanks,

Jon

[Photo Guy]

Jack, Jon is back in a time warp, when Playboy Bunnies were victims of male chauvinist society, and so were all women who dressed to attract those terrible male creatures. Ha.   1980?

[BC]

Jon,

I also don't know why it's tolerated.. Jack's response is 'because I can'..

It's of course quite obvious what's going on and I'm surprised that Dan has not addressed the issue even though it's come up several times. If this is Jack's billboard then state so.  

I wonder what it would be like if hundreds of other site owners did the same...

I say it's 'because someone lets him'.. there's a funky smell building up in here.

[corncrowe]

Jon,

I also don't know why it's tolerated.. Jack's response is 'because I can'..

It's of course quite obvious what's going on and I'm surprised that Dan has not addressed the issue even though it's come up several times. If this is Jack's billboard then state so.

I wonder what it would be like if hundreds of other site owners did the same...

I say it's 'because someone lets him'.. there's a funky smell building up in here.

BC,

Jack has a long history with several boards.  I remember several members from the old board claiming that he "created victims" of scams just so he could recruit other members.  I suggest people revisit the old "Chernovtsy Travel Board" and decide for themselves.

Jon

[Photo Guy]

Photoguy,

Would you kindly do us all a favor and repost your last girlfriend from Ukraine?  I just want to compare actual to expectations.  
Thanks,

Jon

Ah. I see. Now you are going from attacking two beautiful strangers to  personally attacking someone I like.   ....Moderator!?
Is this your 'inner beauty', Jon?  

[corncrowe]

[user=134]Photo Guy[/user] wrote:

Photoguy,

Would you kindly do us all a favor and repost your last girlfriend from Ukraine? I just want to compare actual to expectations.
Thanks,

Jon

Ah. I see. Now you are going from attacking two beautiful strangers to personally attacking someone I like. ....Moderator!?
Is this your 'inner beauty', Jon?

Photoguy,

What are you saying?  Isn't your girlfriend more beautiful?  I would think you'd be proud to display her photo again?  Am I mistaken? 

Where is this attack?  Aren't you proud of her?

Jon

[BC]

OMG..  

Thanks for the link Jon.. 'bowling ball head'.. whata riot.

[Photo Guy]

Jon,
You're transparent. And not beautiful.

[corncrowe]

[user=134]Photo Guy[/user] wrote:

Jon,
You're transparent. And not beautiful.

Photoguy,

Seek help.  But not from pictures of Lugansk!

Jon

[Photo Guy]

As we went down the  l o n g  escalator to the metro in Kyiv.
Yes, she is quite attractive (to me) and she especially has inner beauty.  Mmmm....so fine!    (Sorry for the off topic post)

[corncrowe]

[user=134]Photo Guy[/user] wrote:

As we went down the l o n g escalator to the metro in Kyiv.
Yes, she is quite attractive (to me) and she especially has inner beauty. Mmmm....so fine! (Sorry for the off topic post)

Photoguy,

I agree with you.  Yes, she is attractive.  So stop shopping and marry the girl!

Off-topic...

Jon

[Jack]

Patriotic Park in the center of Lugansk. WARNING! Do not go here if short skirts offend you!

[Jack]

View of Lugansk from Druzhba.

[Jack]

Jon, I am greatly honored that you will no longer recommend me, thank you.

Yesterday you recommended me, today you do not. Usually when I call a spade a spade, or in your case, a nut a nut, I will not be recommended by him.

[Jack]

......Ah. I see. Now you are going from attacking two beautiful strangers to personally attacking someone I like.....

Photoguy, if you say something that offends Jon he will get to you anyway he can. In your case he will try to get to this lady you liked since he cannot get to you. Hopefully she was not wearing a short skirt.

[Photo Guy]

One day during my trip, she did wear a short skirt. I described it to Jon and he wanted to know more about it. I told him I would mail her sexy skirt to him, because he said he wanted to feel horny for a change. But DHL from Ukraine to Texas is too expensive.    :P
Just kidding!!!!   Hey ya gotta laugh, right?.  

[BC]

At least I can recognize you now.

[KenC]

What in the hell is this world coming to if you can't post photos of RW on a forum about RW?  Please keep posting them, Jack. 

BC & Jon,

You guys are waaaay off base with your comments.  It is a real stretch of your imaginations that you link a few photos of hot girls to Jack thumping for business.  Again, please understand that this forum is about RUSSIAN WOMEN!!!!  And Jon that was a cheap shot at Photo's gal no matter how hard you try to backtrack now.

KenC

[Jack]

Ken, nice try but it is the way BC and Jon are. Anyone here for a short time have picked up on these two and for the most part just ignore them.

 

[Admin]

OK - I hope everyone got all that out of their systems.

BC - I respect and value your partipation on the board immensely. As I've divulged in the past, I have met Jack, and like him - though he will tell you that we do not agree on everything. And Doug is a guy I invited to the board only to see him become embroiled in a terrible campaign to defend himself from loads of what I considered to be be unnecessary and highly-personal attacks on himself and his girlfriend.

Now - as for Jack's posting of photos. I guess, truth be known, the reason I haven't objected is because I like the photos. I haven't seen it as him touting his agency, so much as it is that knowing Jack a little, I know this is who he is as a person and sharing with the board what is important to him. He is also using a DSLR camera and lens based on my recommendation, and I see how he is putting it to use.

I can, indeed, see how some would interpret Jack's photos as a means of touting his agency. I honestly did not look at it that way. Still don't.

I hope this clarifies things.

- Dan

[BC]

Ken,

I wish I could believe you.. but I don't.  Heck if I were an agency owner I would do the same. Yeah let's really trash the board and invite them all to post pics of their fav RW's  right in front of their agency with their sign in the background..

After all a picture says a thousand words...

Ever notice that the RW's are almost all walking away from the photographer?

[BC]

Dan,

Guess we cross posted.

Ok.. whatever.

[corncrowe]

Dan,

Guess we cross posted.

Ok.. whatever.

Dan,

Honestly, I can't believe you think that Jack was posting "trip reports"?  Come on, please, I hope you can see that he is using this board to promote his agency or upcoming tour in September.

He was too blantant!  Wxmann did a much better job of showing the city and other historical sites.  When I returned from Kiev, did I post a bunch of skimpy women in short skirts?  No!  Because I think it's only something an agency would do so they can get customers.

Jack should post all his supposed "trip reports" under the agency section where they belong.

Jon

[Admin]

Dan,

Honestly, I can't believe you think that Jack was posting "trip reports"? Come on, please, I hope you can see that he is using this board to promote his agency or upcoming tour in September.

He was too blantant! Wxmann did a much better job of showing the city and other historical sites. When I returned from Kiev, did I post a bunch of skimpy women in short skirts? No! Because I think it's only something an agency would do so they can get customers.

Jack should post all his supposed "trip reports" under the agency section where they belong.

Jon

Jon,

It seems clear that you and Jack had suffered a serious 'falling-out'. I stated exactly what I felt. I, for one, like the photos. Maybe that says something of me and my character, or maybe not, but I still enjoy seeing them.

Perhaps the fact that I like them resulted in my not feeling suspicious of Jack's motives - but I don't think so. I know Jack jsut a little and I think I would know if Jack was running a promotional campaign. He is actually quite an effective marketeer, when he sets his mind to it.

I sincerely believe that Jack was merely sharing some photos with the board that he found interesting, and thought some on the board would find equally interesting.

Having said all that, I am not always correct - and certainly not about Jack (or Jon or anyone else). I am merely stating what I believe.

Hope that clarifies (even more).

- Dan