It appears you have not registered with our community. To register please click here ...

!!

Welcome to Russian Women Discussion - the most informative site for all things related to serious long-term relationships and marriage to a partner from the Former Soviet Union countries!

Please register (it's free!) to gain full access to the many features and benefits of the site. Welcome!

+-

Author Topic: Sliding Scale in RM's interpretation  (Read 5955 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Lily

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2878
  • Country: ca
  • Gender: Female
  • Spouse's Country: No Selection
  • Status: Looking > 5 years
  • Trips: Resident
Sliding Scale in RM's interpretation
« on: August 16, 2009, 12:59:50 AM »
I have seen this in one of Russian fora and would like to share it with you. Enjoy! :)

The below outlines should help men in chosing a quality woman, if they have considerable requirements to a mate.
Everyone has his own parameters of beauty, however, there are some common things that allow people to decide whether this or that woman is beautiful. Generally, these parameters are a basis for 10-point sliding scale. In the essence, the system consists of ten subcategories of appearance which are to be evaluated separately. Then, the ten numbers are to sum up, which could be a 100 point evaluiation, which, in turn, can be tranlated in the comfortable 10-point scale.

For instance, if a woman receives 68 points, divide the number by 10, get 6,8, then round the number and get 6. Therefore, the woman can be regarded as a 6.

The components are as follows:

1. Height. This is what most people notice in a person.

170-178 cm - 10 points
165-168- 9
161-164 - 8
157-160 - 7
152-156 - 6
Shorter than 150 cm brings 1-5 points.
It would be hard to give evaluation criteria for girls of 179cm and taller. If tall girls look greatly built, such girl should not be devaulated. But if her height makes her look somehow disproportionally, this should bring less points.
These evaluation samples are done for men who measure from 178 cm till 188 cm.

2. Legs.

Go up from the bottom :) Evaluate the lenght, slimness, muscles and fat tissues, defects like cellulite, dark spots, hair, etc. Don't forget that high heels make an illusion of long legs and fit buttocks.

An ideal, 10-points legs are those that take a half of total body lenght, measured from internal tigh till the bottom. In addidion, the 10-points legs must be slim and without any defects.
9 is when the proportions are less than the above, or misrepresented due to high heels.
8 is about the same plus some imperfections.
If you see cellulite, this is 7 at best.

It should be well noted that legs, and the whole body, should be better evaluated when the woman wears minimal clothes, preferrably on a beach.

3. Butt

10 points is graded a fit sporty butt with zero defects that measure from 89 till 92 cm around.
Lower points are given proceeding from the butt's volume, sagginess as well and emotions of the man who looks at it ;)

4. Breasts

The criteria here are volume, form, tightness.

10 points scores a tight breast of about 92-100 cm around, or cup C-E, with circle of 2-3 cm in diameter.

9 points brings some 90-25 cm around, if some above criterion is not met.

8 points is a well formed tight cup B.

7 is about the same, less than 90 cm around.

5-6 is something that a woman is not proud to have.

If there is a breast implant, it probably should not lessen the score. Important is that it looks great, and it does not matter what the girl did for that.

5. Hair

10 points - rich beautifully nuanced naturally blond or dark hair, straight or a bit wavy, long of minimum 15 cm lower than her shoulders, with no dandruff or split ends.

9 points are hair shorter than above, or done in a neat hairstyle, or a bit highlighted, or not that rich.

8 are the same as above but of less good quality, or quality colored.
7 are the same but of inferior quality, or short hair.

5-6 points are given if you are not impressed by her hair.

6. Eyes and brows

10 points make a pair of big blue, brown or green eyes with long lashes that are well placed on face, and surrounded by brows of about 6-7 mm wide.

9 are grey, light brown (tea colored), light blue close to white, light green eyes.

6,7,8 points arwe the eyes without the above features of beauty.

7. Lips

10 make the appetizing, larger than average, beautifully formed, richly colored, smooth looking lips, that are able to transform in a fantastic smile.
9 are something less than 10

8 are the lips that cannot transform to beautiful smile.

Little lips, small mouth with less than good teeth are 7.


8. Nose

10 is an ideally straight nose, average or smaller in size, with a neat bridge contour.
9 is about the same but a little arched or snubed nose.
8 is less than well formed, which does not impact face beauty.
7 is nice but less than perfect nose.
6 is average
5 is a nose of some disgarmony (long, snubbed, aquiline) but without a sense of ugliness.

9 Skin

10 is slightly darker skin, with narrow interstices, not fat or dry, without defects like birthmarks, freckles, scars, acne, cellulite, wrinkles.
9 is about the same but of lighter color.
8 may be with a little defects.
7 is good skin but may be with fleckles, a couple of little moles, with a small degree of dryness/fat.
6 is okay skin
1-5 is defected or unhealthy looking skin.

10 Optional parameter

Non-appearance related things like behaviour, dress, form of face, voice, walking, charisma, etc.

...to be continued..:)



Da, da, Canada; Nyet, nyet, Soviet!

Offline SANDRO43

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10687
  • Country: it
  • Gender: Male
  • Spouse's Country: No Selection
  • Status: No Selection
  • Trips: None (yet)
Re: Sliding Scale in RM's interpretation
« Reply #1 on: August 16, 2009, 05:47:24 AM »
Who developed those criteria, Lily? I'm naturally sceptical of 'absolute' standards :-\. For instance, an 'ideal' height of 170-178 cm would be unappealing to a shorter man, also considering the effect of high heels ;). Also, a C-E cup size is a major spread, and E wouldn't look that good on a shorter woman :o.

Personally, I agree on 2-3 cm areolas, but what about nipples :(? Form (hemispherical, cilindrical) and their size relative to areolas ;D?

 
Milan's "Duomo"

Offline Ade

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2673
  • Country: no
  • Gender: Male
  • Spouse's Country: Russia
  • Status: Married > 10 years
  • Trips: 4 - 10
Re: Sliding Scale in RM's interpretation
« Reply #2 on: August 16, 2009, 06:18:03 AM »
 :cluebat: What a joke.

Offline Faux Pas

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10232
  • Country: us
  • Spouse's Country: No Selection
  • Status: No Selection
  • Trips: No Selection
Re: Sliding Scale in RM's interpretation
« Reply #3 on: August 16, 2009, 06:43:03 AM »
Lily,

Looks like something one might find in Cosmopolitan magazine, bullcaca for the most part. One could have a woman with mismatched 5s,6s and 7s and still be a beautiful woman. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder  ;D

Offline Gator

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16987
  • Country: us
  • Gender: Male
  • Spouse's Country: Russia
  • Status: Married 5-10 years
  • Trips: > 10
Re: Sliding Scale in RM's interpretation
« Reply #4 on: August 16, 2009, 07:20:28 AM »
Yep, sounds very much like RM mentality regarding women.

Young AM would have the same scoring system, yet most would have the maturity by age 25, probably sooner, to concentrate on more important aspects.

I never had a scoring system.  Instead, I relied on a subconscious evaluation of all parameters whether I found her attractive (akin to Gestalt psychology?).  Admittedly, I was easily stunned by beauty in my university days; however, we can't hold a man responsible for the errors of his youth (every lad would have given his left testicle to bed the Rose Bowl Queen).  Besides, those learning experiences were necessary to inculcate the concept that raving beauties oftentimes were spoiled princesses or bitches.

Lily, age is not included among the criteria.  So a tall, slender 45-yo with a good "tit job" could score high?

 

Offline Lily

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2878
  • Country: ca
  • Gender: Female
  • Spouse's Country: No Selection
  • Status: Looking > 5 years
  • Trips: Resident
Re: Sliding Scale in RM's interpretation
« Reply #5 on: August 16, 2009, 07:24:42 AM »
I think that Sliding Scale came from the West, originated from American pickuper's vocabulary. You probably know this:



Also, on this forum I sometimes come across topics 'What is a Ten' and something like that. People sometimes tell things like 'she was a 7', or 'it was a 8,5' when they try describing what impression does the woman makes in public. So my guess would be to detail the misterious sliding scale :)

The previous was detals. Now in short, with emphasis on the difference on the scale.

A 5 is an ordinary woman. In American parlance, a Plain Jane may be :) Not a beauty but not ugly. Usually built figure, probably nice face if you give yourself enough time to watch it. The 5s come in large figures in everyday life.

This girl dreams of simple big love, she cannot dress to impress and would like to find a man who will love you for what she can deliver in her inside. One should always try to rise her self-esteem.

A 6 is a pretty woman. Not quite a beauty, but there is something in her. She can be noticed among other girls, has a sense for style. No BS but still can be demanding. Deep inside the 6s realize that they are not beauties, and are sensitive to what men say about them.

A 7 is a beautiful girl. She is visible among others right away, like a precious stone among shingle. She knows her worth and has a BS, as it helps her to get rid of men. & like to be friends with men and do not notice that the friends are the aspiring lovers.

A 7 differs form an 8 by absence of model standards, despite her beauty. It may be her lack of eligible height, or some body complexion. Therefore a 7 never gets into high league, where her appearance gets easily shaded by striking beauties.

An 8 is a beautiful model. Great shape, well groomed face. This girl does not only know her worth, she actually has one. Among her suitors are rich and powerful men. The 8s never wait for anyone, if she loses one suitor, she instantly gets several on his place.

A 9 is a supermodel.

Among beatiful models crowded near a catwalk or camera, sometimes you can see one who looks amazingly brillant even surrounded by her colleagues. Other girls look bleak comparing to her. This girl is walking perfection, by body, face, style and by her something special. When she walks on the street, all men either stare at her, or try to approach and talk to her. This girl can get whatever she wants, she knows that. She has more than a BS, but just a beton wall around her.

A 10 is a star, celebrity, very rich person, wanted and admired nationwide. She differs from an 9 by the fact that she already has everything.

Now come 'illiquid' types.

A 4 is a girl with a defect. An average girl but something is not okay with her. All pretty fatties go to this category.

A 3 is ugly. Naturally unattractive face, bad shape.

A 2 has a severe birth defect, or a normal person that is on bottom of life. Drug addicts, alcoholics, etc.

A 1 is an old, drunk, STD-ed woman. Ugly and ill.

A 0 is a death.
Da, da, Canada; Nyet, nyet, Soviet!

Offline SANDRO43

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10687
  • Country: it
  • Gender: Male
  • Spouse's Country: No Selection
  • Status: No Selection
  • Trips: None (yet)
Re: Sliding Scale in RM's interpretation
« Reply #6 on: August 16, 2009, 07:25:06 AM »
Lily, age is not included among the criteria.  So a tall, slender 45-yo with a good "tit job" could score high?
Many years ago I had a lithe g/f with 'champagne-cup' size 2s (B?). Quite a nice setup ;D.
Milan's "Duomo"

Offline CallMeSasha

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 65
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sliding Scale in RM's interpretation
« Reply #7 on: August 16, 2009, 07:28:56 AM »
is there a scale for men, i'd love to know my score!

on a serious note, scoring other people on features makes me feel a little uncomfortable - at least since we left the school playground!

Offline Lily

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2878
  • Country: ca
  • Gender: Female
  • Spouse's Country: No Selection
  • Status: Looking > 5 years
  • Trips: Resident
Re: Sliding Scale in RM's interpretation
« Reply #8 on: August 16, 2009, 07:35:10 AM »
Who developed those criteria, Lily? I'm naturally sceptical of 'absolute' standards :-\. For instance, an 'ideal' height of 170-178 cm would be unappealing to a shorter man, also considering the effect of high heels ;). Also, a C-E cup size is a major spread, and E wouldn't look that good on a shorter woman :o.

Personally, I agree on 2-3 cm areolas, but what about nipples :(? Form (hemispherical, cilindrical) and their size relative to areolas ;D?

 

Sandro, this classification comes from young ambitious Russian men who want the best possible women for themselves.  You are right on the height thing, but the presented scale is just a very general guidance and should be adjusted depending on individual tastes.


Gator, as far as the year of birth is not tattooed on the woman's forehead or other body parts, same standards can be applied, IMHO :)  Russian men are of different opinion about this, and believe that 35+ (or even stricter the 30+) are out of the dating market at all, therefore should not be scaled.
Da, da, Canada; Nyet, nyet, Soviet!

Offline Lily

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2878
  • Country: ca
  • Gender: Female
  • Spouse's Country: No Selection
  • Status: Looking > 5 years
  • Trips: Resident
Re: Sliding Scale in RM's interpretation
« Reply #9 on: August 16, 2009, 07:39:49 AM »
is there a scale for men, i'd love to know my score!

on a serious note, scoring other people on features makes me feel a little uncomfortable - at least since we left the school playground!

Sasha, our guys believe that being scored is actually a honor for a woman, because it is sign of interest from men :)

There is no scale for men to score, as the requirements to men's appearance seem to be generally not that apparent. People tend to be very demanding to a woman's physique, though. 
Da, da, Canada; Nyet, nyet, Soviet!

Offline CallMeSasha

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 65
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sliding Scale in RM's interpretation
« Reply #10 on: August 16, 2009, 09:22:23 AM »
Hi Lily,

and what do the girls think about being scored?

as for judging men, well my comment was a little tongue-in-cheek (call it the famous british sense of humour!) - however a man can be happily married & vain at the same time!! LOL

Offline SANDRO43

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10687
  • Country: it
  • Gender: Male
  • Spouse's Country: No Selection
  • Status: No Selection
  • Trips: None (yet)
Re: Sliding Scale in RM's interpretation
« Reply #11 on: August 16, 2009, 09:27:50 AM »
however a man can be happily married & vain at the same time!! LOL
Provided you don't start telling us you don't look a day older than 25 :( ;D. We've already had a surfeit of that :-\.
Milan's "Duomo"

Offline Lily

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2878
  • Country: ca
  • Gender: Female
  • Spouse's Country: No Selection
  • Status: Looking > 5 years
  • Trips: Resident
Re: Sliding Scale in RM's interpretation
« Reply #12 on: August 16, 2009, 09:43:35 AM »
Hi Lily,

and what do the girls think about being scored?


I guess they think no good  :-X
Da, da, Canada; Nyet, nyet, Soviet!

Offline kievstar

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1875
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sliding Scale in RM's interpretation
« Reply #13 on: August 16, 2009, 09:53:01 AM »
This is more on physical rating of a woman.  Not on rating a potential wife. 

Many man regarding of age would rate women this way.  However, very few men could marry a physical looking 10 because they tend to choose very successful men. 

Offline CallMeSasha

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 65
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sliding Scale in RM's interpretation
« Reply #14 on: August 16, 2009, 10:20:20 AM »
Provided you don't start telling us you don't look a day older than 25 :( ;D. We've already had a surfeit of that :-\.

me not look a day over 25? right then Mr, that's us fallen out with each other already!!! LOL  ;D

(only kidding!)

Offline Lonewing

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 20
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sliding Scale in RM's interpretation
« Reply #15 on: August 16, 2009, 01:32:57 PM »
There is one part this sliding scale doesn't take into account: Spatial Constraints.  A 7 is one crowd could be a 9 in another crowd by the sheer absence of better competition.  Naturally, this volitale pool could be instantly changed by the addition of one prettier face.

National Geopraphic did an article on Beauty back in the 1990s or 2000s focusing on what it is and if there are any absolutes.  This may be surprising, but even very young children reach towards the "prettier" face before reaching towards the "ugly" face or even "plain" face. 

I'd say the persoanly has to be scored along with the outside looks.  I find it interesting how the second scale has personality types tied to the levels - and what men want seems to be a 5 personality in a 10 body.  Common, everyday down to earth humility inside, supermodel outwards.  No wonder so many are doomed to fail!

Offline JR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2831
  • Gender: Male
  • Hey, what do I know?
Re: Sliding Scale in RM's interpretation
« Reply #16 on: August 17, 2009, 09:29:35 PM »
A 10 is a star, celebrity, very rich person, wanted and admired nationwide. She differs from an 9 by the fact that she already has everything.

So Oprah and Rosie O'donnell are 10s? I'm going to shoot myself :)
Always be a first-rate version of yourself, instead of a second-rate version of somebody else :)

Offline kievstar

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1875
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sliding Scale in RM's interpretation
« Reply #17 on: August 18, 2009, 07:04:52 AM »
Every guy is going to have a different opinion on a 10.  Your married to a 10 when you no longer look at other women.  Few men do this so there are a lot of lookers. 

Offline Aloe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1672
  • Country: 00
  • Gender: Female
  • Spouse's Country: No Selection
  • Status: No Selection
  • Trips: Resident
Re: Sliding Scale in RM's interpretation
« Reply #18 on: August 18, 2009, 07:48:05 AM »
4. Breasts

The criteria here are volume, form, tightness.

10 points scores a tight breast of about 92-100 cm around, or cup C-E, with circle of 2-3 cm in diameter.



i have D cups with 89-90 circumference  :rolleyes2: why does it say C cup is 92+ ? :P

Offline Aloe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1672
  • Country: 00
  • Gender: Female
  • Spouse's Country: No Selection
  • Status: No Selection
  • Trips: Resident
Re: Sliding Scale in RM's interpretation
« Reply #19 on: August 18, 2009, 07:55:01 AM »

and what do the girls think about being scored?

i think its lame and useless, one man's 10 is another man's 0. Where was that topic where somebody said angelina jolie is a 0, im sure many men would rate her 10. Ive never heard of such ratings before i joined this board, must be something western, in real life people use "beautiful, hot, so-so, ugly" and other adjectives.

Offline kievstar

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1875
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sliding Scale in RM's interpretation
« Reply #20 on: August 18, 2009, 01:42:00 PM »
Aloe, I was the guy who rated Angelie a zero.  Put Madonna at zero to.  Plus Jennifer Annistan at zero.  Just do not like short girls.  Ratings are in the eye of the beholder.  Most men I know in USA like short women with big behinds who are non white or mix race.

Offline Gator

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16987
  • Country: us
  • Gender: Male
  • Spouse's Country: Russia
  • Status: Married 5-10 years
  • Trips: > 10
Re: Sliding Scale in RM's interpretation
« Reply #21 on: August 18, 2009, 02:17:34 PM »
i have D cups with 89-90 circumference  :rolleyes2: why does it say C cup is 92+ ? :P

You are bragging and justifiably so.  Evidently you have a small rib cage.  Such a combinaton is perfect in most men's eyes and they would give you a "10" without considering the other criteria.  You could be missing a front tooth and still get a "10."

Aloe, you do realize that we need this measurement confirmed. :P

Offline mies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2389
  • Country: ua
  • Gender: Female
  • Spouse's Country: Russia
  • Status: Married > 10 years
  • Trips: No Selection
Re: Sliding Scale in RM's interpretation
« Reply #22 on: August 18, 2009, 02:50:18 PM »
*
« Last Edit: August 18, 2009, 06:49:24 PM by mies »

Offline JR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2831
  • Gender: Male
  • Hey, what do I know?
Re: Sliding Scale in RM's interpretation
« Reply #23 on: August 18, 2009, 03:44:14 PM »
Here is everything I need to know about a "10."

I can't describe it to you but I know it when I see it :)
Always be a first-rate version of yourself, instead of a second-rate version of somebody else :)

 

+-RWD Stats

Members
Total Members: 8891
Latest: csmdbr
New This Month: 0
New This Week: 0
New Today: 0
Stats
Total Posts: 546809
Total Topics: 21009
Most Online Today: 14570
Most Online Ever: 194418
(June 04, 2025, 03:26:40 PM)
Users Online
Members: 4
Guests: 14546
Total: 14550

+-Recent Posts

Re: Where to get some good advice for dating FSU women. by JohnDearGreen
November 24, 2025, 06:51:41 PM

Re: WMVM Love by conveyor??? by Trenchcoat
November 21, 2025, 11:33:12 AM

WMVM Love by conveyor??? by 2tallbill
November 21, 2025, 10:15:39 AM

Re: WMVM Love by conveyor??? by Trenchcoat
November 21, 2025, 08:51:02 AM

Re: The Struggle For Ukraine by Trenchcoat
November 21, 2025, 08:22:34 AM

WMVM Love by conveyor??? by 2tallbill
November 20, 2025, 12:33:03 PM

Re: WMVM Love by conveyor??? by Trenchcoat
November 15, 2025, 03:50:07 AM

WMVM Love by conveyor??? by 2tallbill
November 14, 2025, 09:45:34 AM

Re: Interesting Articles by Trenchcoat
November 13, 2025, 04:23:20 PM

Re: Interesting Articles by olgac
November 13, 2025, 01:39:20 PM

Powered by EzPortal