It appears you have not registered with our community. To register please click here ...

!!

Welcome to Russian Women Discussion - the most informative site for all things related to serious long-term relationships and marriage to a partner from the Former Soviet Union countries!

Please register (it's free!) to gain full access to the many features and benefits of the site. Welcome!

+-

Author Topic: Long vs. Short Correspondence Times  (Read 14586 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Misha

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7314
  • Country: ca
  • Gender: Male
  • Spouse's Country: Russia
  • Status: Married 5-10 years
  • Trips: > 10
Re: Long vs. Short Correspondence Times
« Reply #25 on: July 28, 2010, 10:35:15 AM »
Add some time to explain to a foreigner where is the nearest Russian consulate, to send him the link to the consulate's website, to explain him why does he have to be there at 7 in the morning, why does he have to purchase health & travel insurance in advance, why does he have to make 3x4 cm pictures and not just crop his face from a group picture taken during his last birthday, how to install Acrobat Reader which is needed to print out the application form, guide him line after line though filling visa application form... ad nauseum. According to my personal experience, in takes a week in the very BEST case.

Olga, I have to say, if this is the case, I truly have to wonder about some of the men in question  :-X Ils ne sont pas très futés selon moi si c'est le cas.

Offline GQBlues

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11752
  • Country: us
  • Spouse's Country: No Selection
  • Status: No Selection
  • Trips: None (yet)
Re: Long vs. Short Correspondence Times
« Reply #26 on: July 28, 2010, 01:06:02 PM »
But I realise that for Americans, who can't fly to Moscow on Friday evening and go back home on Sunday evening, things are very different due to distance and flight costs.

I know one guy who did.

He met a lady Tuesday and flew to see her by Friday. He even wrote a trip report for it. His handle was 'Freebird', from Atlanta, and his T/R appropriately titled, "My Weekend in Moscow".
Quote from: msmob
1. Because of 'man', global warming is causing desert and arid areas to suffer long, dry spell.
2. The 2018 Camp Fire and Woolsey California wildfires are forests burning because of global warming.
3. N95 mask will choke you dead after 30 min. of use.

Offline Blues Fairy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2058
  • Country: us
  • Gender: Female
  • Spouse's Country: Russia
  • Status: Married 5-10 years
  • Trips: No Selection
Re: Long vs. Short Correspondence Times
« Reply #27 on: July 28, 2010, 04:27:18 PM »
What do FSUW prefer: having a long (6 to 12 months or longer) correspondence with a man before meeting him, or a short time period ( 2 to 4 months).

I may have preferred 2 or 4 or 6 months' correspondences but those never worked out.  My 3-year correspondence, however, did.  In the end, it's the result that matters.

Offline Olga_Mouse

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 185
  • Country: ru
  • Gender: Female
  • Spouse's Country: No Selection
  • Status: No Selection
  • Trips: No Selection
Re: Long vs. Short Correspondence Times
« Reply #28 on: July 28, 2010, 04:47:43 PM »
Olga, I have to say, if this is the case, I truly have to wonder about some of the men in question  :-X

Misha, I'm truly wondering about it for maaaaany years now... Or is it just my famous luck? Dunno...

Ils ne sont pas très futés selon moi si c'est le cas.

Malheureusement j'ai jamais vu le site ou des hommes devraient écrire leur IQ apres leur age  :rolleyes2:
"If I get through this job without completely losing my mind, it will be a miracle of Biblical proportions" [Commander Susan Ivanova, Earth Alliance space station Babylon 5]

Offline Blues Fairy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2058
  • Country: us
  • Gender: Female
  • Spouse's Country: Russia
  • Status: Married 5-10 years
  • Trips: No Selection
Re: Long vs. Short Correspondence Times
« Reply #29 on: July 28, 2010, 05:44:54 PM »
Malheureusement j'ai jamais vu le site ou des hommes devraient écrire leur IQ apres leur age  :rolleyes2:

Actually I found my now-husband on a website like this.  The site offered multiple tests, including IQ, personality etc. and most people had their IQ results shown on their profile (as a searchable parameter).  8)

Offline Misha

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7314
  • Country: ca
  • Gender: Male
  • Spouse's Country: Russia
  • Status: Married 5-10 years
  • Trips: > 10
Re: Long vs. Short Correspondence Times
« Reply #30 on: July 28, 2010, 06:36:25 PM »
Misha, I'm truly wondering about it for maaaaany years now... Or is it just my famous luck? Dunno...

Malheureusement j'ai jamais vu le site ou des hommes devraient écrire leur IQ apres leur age  :rolleyes2:

Ce serait quand même pas si mal. Cela pourrait faciliter le triage  ;D

Offline Aloe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1672
  • Country: 00
  • Gender: Female
  • Spouse's Country: No Selection
  • Status: No Selection
  • Trips: Resident
Re: Long vs. Short Correspondence Times
« Reply #31 on: July 29, 2010, 01:53:04 AM »
Add some time to explain to a foreigner where is the nearest Russian consulate, to send him the link to the consulate's website, to explain him why does he have to be there at 7 in the morning, why does he have to purchase health & travel insurance in advance, why does he have to make 3x4 cm pictures and not just crop his face from a group picture taken during his last birthday, how to install Acrobat Reader which is needed to print out the application form, guide him line after line though filling visa application form... ad nauseum. According to my personal experience, in takes a week in the very BEST case.
I never had to explain any of those things to anyone  :D The man you described above sounds a bit on the silly side, who would want him? Especially the acrobat reader part. Computer-illiterate men just don't do the trick for me  ;D
I did fill in both visa forms for my hubby though :D Wait i rememeber now, i had to explain to him why he must type in his travel passport number, instead of his national. Damn  :D What i actually did is open the form (its in pdf, so you cant change it), make a screenshot of it, then type in all the data in photoshop, save, and send him the jpg. Not because he didnt have acrobat though :D :D
By the way, russian consulates around the world seem to open at around 9. Don't have to be there at 7 at all. The line for visa is so short, you are done within 30 minutes of your arrival, no matter what time, as long as the consulate works. Now the line to the russian department.. Last time i went, i had to spend there 1 hr in line and 2 hrs sitting around waiting for them to print up one little paper
« Last Edit: July 29, 2010, 02:06:18 AM by Aloe »

Offline civi68

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 552
  • Country: us
  • Gender: Male
  • Spouse's Country: No Selection
  • Status: Looking > 5 years
  • Trips: 4 - 10
Re: Long vs. Short Correspondence Times
« Reply #32 on: August 01, 2010, 09:38:15 AM »
I had success with corresponding for 3 months, then telling a woman or women that I will travel and purchase a ticket 3 months in advance for a total of 6 months correspondence. I find that the more sincere women will stick with you. Yes, the correspondence will get routine. The more motivated women will stick with you as opposed to some who are on the sites for something to do or willing to meet men for something to do until they find the "one." Rarely, the one ends up being a foreigner and they leave the sites after a year or so.
   I found that the women who write briefly or write like SMS messages you can't get to know them and may not be sincere. I prefer the women who write detailed letters, ask me questions, talk on skpye, and share their thoughts. I also found that women who say they are not sure about leaving their country or say, "I don't know, America is far away, I can't leave my family, maybe Europe, etc" or say they have a good paying job and nice flat, usually in Moscow or St. Pete,  usually don't come through. So, I focus on ones who say they are interested in leaving for a good man. Once, I did meet a woman from Moscow who wrote briefly and we had a good time when I visited her twice. But in the end, she did not want to leave Russia. Mike

Offline Ravens9273

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 347
  • Gender: Male
  • I know everything! The wife gives me the answers.
Re: Long vs. Short Correspondence Times
« Reply #33 on: August 01, 2010, 12:19:09 PM »
While this topic started as to what people prefer I think it should also be looked at as to what works.

From my time here and people I have met a majority of the married couples had long correspondence. Myself included (2 years 4 months).
I think longer correspondence builds stronger bonds between two people giving a better chance of success when meeting.
During the years I have seen many do the quick visits and have seen very limited results leading to marriage in it.

This could be looked at in many ways. They did not build as strong a bond before meeting. Different motives etc...

I personally never believed in the foot race method. If someone wanted me to come so fast I would have to question why. But one thing I can bet is it would have nothing to do directly with myself.
I think the best way to get an answer to this question is to have a poll for married members and see how long the corresponded before first meet. In the end a marriage determines the success of the courtship.


Offline ML

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12252
  • Country: us
  • Gender: Male
  • Spouse's Country: Ukraine
  • Status: Married > 10 years
  • Trips: > 10
Re: Long vs. Short Correspondence Times
« Reply #34 on: August 26, 2010, 09:18:20 AM »
From my time here and people I have met a majority of the married couples had long correspondence. Myself included (2 years 4 months).

Are you talking about 2 yr, 4 mo before first meeting, before engagement, or before marriage?
A beautiful woman is pleasant to look at, but it is easier to live with a pleasant acting one.

Offline ML

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12252
  • Country: us
  • Gender: Male
  • Spouse's Country: Ukraine
  • Status: Married > 10 years
  • Trips: > 10
Re: Long vs. Short Correspondence Times
« Reply #35 on: August 26, 2010, 09:19:52 AM »
My 3-year correspondence, however, did. 

Are you talking about 3 years before first meeting, before engagement, or before marriage?
A beautiful woman is pleasant to look at, but it is easier to live with a pleasant acting one.

Offline tfcrew

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5877
  • Country: us
  • Gender: Male
  • North Texas... Married 21 years
  • Spouse's Country: Ukraine
  • Status: No Selection
  • Trips: 4 - 10
Re: Long vs. Short Correspondence Times
« Reply #36 on: August 27, 2010, 08:52:19 AM »
My guess 4-6 months is the average initial visit [after the lady invites.]

Some of our USA members haven't ever gone to Europe and may never will.
The OP [WmGo] has been a few times but what ever happened?
[Been absent for a year]

If a visa is needed [to Russia perhaps] a passport/visa expedited service is the way to go. The Wash DC office will place the visa in the passport that afternoon [for the extra...worth it]
The paperwork is FedExed to the embassy and back, and risk of loss in the mail [sometimes happens] is eliminated.
~There is no one more blind than those who refuse to see and none more deaf as those who will not listen~
~Think about the intelligence of the average person and then realize that half of the people are even more stupid than that~

Offline LanaRUS

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 49
  • Gender: Female
Re: Long vs. Short Correspondence Times
« Reply #37 on: August 28, 2010, 01:46:33 AM »
I think, 4-6 month  often dialogue in skype   it is absolutely enough for decision-making about meeting.
Never stop smiling even when you ar sad. Someone may fall in love with your smile.

Offline Rina_G

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 386
  • Country: us
  • Gender: Female
  • Spouse's Country: Russia
  • Status: Married 0-2 years
  • Trips: 1 - 3
Re: Long vs. Short Correspondence Times
« Reply #38 on: August 28, 2010, 03:17:11 AM »
My opinion - from first Hi! I gave 2 monthes for conversation
If in this period we stay on bla-bla-bla - and man doesn'r begin to talk (and to do something) for real meeting - I was continued my searching for.
If he wants to have a good conversation he aren't ready for serious relations now. 
You can pleasure talk with him your whole life but... in Skype lol
If you can dream it you can do it. Me

Offline Avis

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 86
  • Country: om
  • Gender: Female
  • Spouse's Country: No Selection
  • Status: Married 5-10 years
  • Trips: Resident
Re: Long vs. Short Correspondence Times
« Reply #39 on: August 28, 2010, 07:18:33 AM »
Facts, only facts.

Met my BF on day X.
In a week time he promised to come to see me not later than in 3 months time (which he did, could have done earlier but had his holiday booked long before we met).

So basically the rest of the time until we met we were getting to know each other better, and still do, and it's only getting better with every time we see each other in person (4 times by now).


If we lived in the same ZIP code, we'd have met each other in no time, I'm sure, as he literally went on rampage winning my attention and my time, left no room for me to think about other guys :)

My point is, if you guys click, it doesn't matter how long you email each other. You just click  8)

Bless you :)

Offline JR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2831
  • Gender: Male
  • Hey, what do I know?
Re: Long vs. Short Correspondence Times
« Reply #40 on: November 12, 2010, 11:19:35 AM »
What do FSUW prefer: having a long (6 to 12 months or longer) correspondence with a man before meeting him, or a short time period ( 2 to 4 months).


Women prefer hansome men with lots of money))) The less time you spend getting to know someone before you know them will correlate directly to how much surprise (good or bad) you feel when you meet them.

Either way can work but I like the approach of not writing all, just go and meet some women in as natural a setting as you can manage. A few here have done that and it seems to have worked for them.
Always be a first-rate version of yourself, instead of a second-rate version of somebody else :)

Offline Gator

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16987
  • Country: us
  • Gender: Male
  • Spouse's Country: Russia
  • Status: Married 5-10 years
  • Trips: > 10
Re: Long vs. Short Correspondence Times
« Reply #41 on: November 12, 2010, 09:29:01 PM »

So basically the rest of the time until we met we were getting to know each other better, and still do, and it's only getting better with every time we see each other in person (4 times by now).

Bless you :)

Fantastic!  And bless you too.

 :couple:

Offline JR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2831
  • Gender: Male
  • Hey, what do I know?
Re: Long vs. Short Correspondence Times
« Reply #42 on: November 13, 2010, 08:58:09 AM »

If we lived in the same ZIP code, we'd have met each other in no time, I'm sure, as he literally went on rampage winning my attention and my time, left no room for me to think about other guys :)


Can anyone say "Control Freak?" I knew you could ;)
Always be a first-rate version of yourself, instead of a second-rate version of somebody else :)

Offline Gator

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16987
  • Country: us
  • Gender: Male
  • Spouse's Country: Russia
  • Status: Married 5-10 years
  • Trips: > 10
Re: Long vs. Short Correspondence Times
« Reply #43 on: November 13, 2010, 02:35:35 PM »
Can anyone say "Control Freak?" I knew you could ;)

Huh?  Maybe you know more than me about Avis's situation.

Some women enjoy full attention and respond to it, contrary to the "pick up" books that suggest a man should act mostly disinterested as if he had plenty of choices. If Avis's man were coy in the beginning, perhaps Avis would have been unimpressed.

Offline JR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2831
  • Gender: Male
  • Hey, what do I know?
Re: Long vs. Short Correspondence Times
« Reply #44 on: November 13, 2010, 06:45:16 PM »
Huh?  Maybe you know more than me about Avis's situation.


Nope, don't know a damn thing about it. Just being a smart ass, you have to admit I'm pretty good at it))))
Always be a first-rate version of yourself, instead of a second-rate version of somebody else :)

 

+-RWD Stats

Members
Total Members: 8889
Latest: UA2006
New This Month: 0
New This Week: 0
New Today: 0
Stats
Total Posts: 546368
Total Topics: 20980
Most Online Today: 1612
Most Online Ever: 194418
(June 04, 2025, 03:26:40 PM)
Users Online
Members: 4
Guests: 1471
Total: 1475

+-Recent Posts

Re: The Struggle For Ukraine by Trenchcoat
Today at 01:20:56 AM

Re: The Struggle For Ukraine by Trenchcoat
July 16, 2025, 02:24:55 PM

Re: The Struggle For Ukraine by olgac
July 16, 2025, 01:53:17 PM

Re: The Struggle For Ukraine by Trenchcoat
July 16, 2025, 01:46:18 PM

Re: The Struggle For Ukraine by Trenchcoat
July 16, 2025, 07:46:40 AM

Re: The Struggle For Ukraine by olgac
July 15, 2025, 06:04:33 PM

Re: The Struggle For Ukraine by olgac
July 15, 2025, 06:00:14 PM

Re: The Struggle For Ukraine by Trenchcoat
July 15, 2025, 04:54:09 PM

Re: The Struggle For Ukraine by Trenchcoat
July 15, 2025, 04:40:33 PM

Re: The Struggle For Ukraine by olgac
July 15, 2025, 02:56:15 PM

Powered by EzPortal

create account