Fall trip Ukraine

[Turboguy]

I particularly liked the part about buying dildo's for gifts.   The rest of us talk about perfume, candy, flowers.  We must have been really dumb to not realize what gals really want for a present. 

Now we know that every man should stock up on those for a WMVM trip.   They are probably cheaper by the dozen and I can just imagine the look of happiness on a girls face when you meet her at the airport for the first meeting and hand her a dildo.

[TexasBoar]

~Boar

[Jet]

but still it would be nice if you actually based your comments on an accurate reading of my posts.

Accurate reading of your posts is what led me to the 100+ speculation.
Nearly 2 years ago you reported being intimate with 37 FSU women, you've reported several since so we'll round off to 40 to make the math simple.
You also stated that you date abroad in a very similar fashion as you do at home, so it would not be unreasonable to deduce you've been intimate with at least another 40 stateside.
You further proclaimed you date many women in other countries that you visit, such as Canada. So even if we cut that 40 by half, assuming you spend less time in all other countries besides USA and those of the FSU we are already at 100.

The odd thing is that you continue to tell me my opinions/assumptions are inaccurate, yet you've posted nothing to dispute or correct them. Could my numbers be low?

In the end, I really don't care how many women you sleep with, as long as they consent and you practice safe sex, so as not to cross contaminate the remaining world population of women over 35 

[Gator]

I think most of us agree that if all of us wrote about the same subject and if we all subscribed to the same opinions, this board would be BORING.  Although many may not agree with Albert, his writing does add some flavor, or at least reveals the other side (I did not say “darker side”).  Further, we would never be treated to Turbo’s hilarious comment about presenting dildos to RW at the airport. 

Albert, I am not complimenting you.  You have made love to 40-100 FSUW and have not yet found the one who makes you really happy, someone to focus on.  That says a lot, so much that words are not needed.  You say you are committed.  30 years is a long time, yet you are not married today.  If it was a death, you have my sympathy.  Perhaps it was a bad divorce or an unwanted divorce, and you went on a sex binge afterwards to reaffirm your confidence.  But a binge usually lasts for a year or two at most, particularly if you are in your mid 50s.   Something ain’t right. 

But I do read your sex stories – you keep them PG rated and that is good.

[Clarification by Gator:  Albert – You will read the above sometime, and I wish to add something.  When I say “something ain’t right”, I do not claim that you have a sexual addiction.  I do not know what makes you do what you are doing.  I am not a therapist nor a Christian fundamentalist.  Rather, it is not the behavior of a man seeking marriage with a RW, the focus of most men here. 

Because you post here rather than on:

 http://www.internationalsexguide.info/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=200

makes me think you do eventually seek marriage.  Maybe you do cross over and post at the other site.  Are you Dr. Skank?]

[Turboguy]

For me, I could know my feelings about Albert more is I knew what his aproaches and methods were.   If he contacts gals and says.  Hey I am a nice guy and am looking for a sex partner, then more power to him.

If he is aproaching them as a potential husband and deceiving them because he has no real interest in a perminant relationship then I would not think too highly of him.

The dildo as a gift part when he said that really through me for a loop.  To be honest I could not give a woman I had been married to for years a dildo as a gift.  Yes, maybe if she confessed a life long desire to own one, then maybe.  Passing out dildos to gals you have known a day or two just,  well I don't know what it just.  I could not find words.

Yes, Gator, I agree.  Diversity is good for the board.  We do get pretty diverse don't we.

[Albert]

Jet says:  What am I missing then Albert? Just a very short cruise through some of your old posts seem to completely contradict what you're saying earlier in this thread 

- - - - - -

Thanks Jet for reviewing many of my past posts and putting some highlights here.  But jeez, I don't think I have forgotten any of that.  I am more and more not being able to find my keys, my sunglasses, my ballpoint, etc., but I still seem to remember what I wrote.  :-))

I hate to keep belaboring this and you, Jet, but I am a loss now as to my 'complete contradiction' as you put it.  I reread my words that you posted and can't seem to find the contradiction.  Can you help me out here by just sticking to maybe a couple of my sentences that are contradictory?  Thanks

[Jet]

OK cranking up the "signal to noise" ratio. I included more the first time so as not to be accused of taking things out of context.
The argument boils down to this:

NOW: There are basically no differences between FSU women and western women.

VS

THEN: But there is a difference between these women and AW.



NOW: Aside from body weight, there are no differences.

VS

THEN: Again this is much different than my typical experience with AW <snip>I think this is all part of the general attitude of FSU women<snip>It seems to be a cultural thing

I also wanted you to understand that I too remember what you wrote and I honestly don't believe I've mischaracterized misquoted, misread, or misunderstood your posts.

[Albert]

OK cranking up the "signal to noise" ratio. I included more the first time so as not to be accused of taking things out of context.
The argument boils down to this:I also wanted you to understand that I too remember what you wrote and I honestly don't believe I've mischaracterized misquoted, misread, or misunderstood your posts.
[/quote]

OK, Jet thanks for making it more simple for me.

Yes, I now see that I have said no differences in some places and differences in other places.  But isn't this about the relevant topics? 

I will try to clarify, but I think you already know the answer to this.

In your first NOW, I was responding to someone who claimed the superiority of FSU women over AW with respect to home values, etc.  I meant no differences there.  But of course if someone wanted to take my no differences out of context, they could say: "How silly you are, most FSU women speak Russian whereas AW do not."  But you know this of course when you were making the quotes.

In the First THEN, the subject was more specific about sex, I think.

In your second NOW and THEN, we have the same case of general vs specific.  One was a statement responding to someone who was talking about the qualities of FSU women in a general sense, and the second was addressed to a specific situation.

But overall very good work on your part in digging out this info.  A more important question might be why you chose me to dig out this info for.  I'll bet you could find similar items where most all posters have said something different with respect to a general situation and a specific situation.

So what is it about me that caused you to go to this trouble?  Why have you taken such an interest in me?

[Son of Clyde]

Albert, most of the guys here have posted a photograph at one time or another where is yours? I want to see the RWD stud.

[Jet]

So what is it about me that caused you to go to this trouble?  Why have you taken such an interest in me?

That's easy, because:
A) You accused me of erroneously paraphrasing, and making mistakes with your "actual factual statements"
B) The board has been slow lately so I thought it might be fun to spice things up 

Actually it was no trouble at all, I did a quick search of your username and the term "150". All my quotes were from either that page of results, the page before it or the page after it - a very small sample really.  :noidea: