jb well stated on the ecomomics..
on an average salary, i could make all those trips to the FSU, because i owned my new home outright, had no car loan and zero credit card dept. These are the types of things that culturally/ecomomically are hard to explain/understand as most average americans in my income bracket have a boat load of debt , credytit cards /mortgage car etc. butthey live a very similar lifestyule on borrowed money. In the FSU credit has not been a big factor but it is becoming one quickly.
on the BCIS front-
Any, I repeat, any, irregularity in an application will result in a denial these days. The more red flags you throw into the mix the better is the chance of refusal.
a letter in our last name was typoed by the ukranian buarcreacy incorrectly.
so while her 131 visa (not K1) was approved.. she could not get it or use it untill the typo was corrected within the ukranian system. fun stuff.
additionally now three years of marriage down the road
we need to file AOS for her permenant card ..(instead of conditional.
I supplied everthing the BCIS asked for in the AOS application.
proof of :
joint accounts
joint IRS filings
joint utility bills
drivers licenses and other proofs of living at the same address.
notirized affidivats from a bunch of people that know we are married and the nature of our relationship
tons of photos of us together eat various functions thru the years,, with friends family etc..
keep in mind folks the AOS is simply an adjustment of status..
status you already have-
you are simply providing proofs that you are still married, and still in the same circumstance the original visa was issued under.
in our case she immigrated on a I 131 (i dont temeber the number sactually)
and is already married to a US citizen for several years.
her status is temporary (GC) for two years, to perove its legitimacy, thens its time to adjust the status to permanent.
we provided every proof a reasonable person could ask for.
afterall they are just trying to determine that you are still married living in the same house together,
and is not an marriage soley for immigration purposes
i get a letter back asking me to provide further proofs ..and a list of those items needed.
fine.
the letter goes on to list the items seperatly,
and THEN states directly below each of them that
"you have already provided this spercific information ,
do not resend it"

the letter concluded with the request that we send further proofs for there to be enough evidence for a positive answer to our petition..
so what exactly were they asking for?
I replied rather pointedly that since i had already sent everything they asked for and they had noted as such..
that maybe they would like to base thier responce on something more aunthentic? and generiusly offered them to come share our home for severeal months to make better informed decision on such an important matter of wether we had a legitimate marriage.
I also informed them that if they are going to grill married couples with obvious proofs of still being married and living together,,
after 2 years! and make them wait 2 years to even file in a one month "window time frame" jump thrui all the hoops..
that it would be adviseable to NOT outline the exact process to file a successful AOS when no longer married to the original petitioner on thier websight .which can be filed at anytime..
no needf to wait,, my wife could have seperated from me-
filed in the first 6 weeks- had her AOS adjusted within 3 months
to permeant and we could "get back together" and been done with all this years ago.
isnt the WHOLE IDEA of even having a AOS yeasrs later, to insure people are not abusing the system.to wed out the ones wantingto take an easy patrh?
not to make the *loop hole* MUCH MUCH EASIER than the correct filing?
anyway my responce from them is now they will schedule us an interview. sometime in the future..
i am REALLY really looking forward to it..!!
as perhaps they would like us to consumate the marriage in thier office.. what the hell is left to prove? without them living with us 24/7?an offer i already generously made.
quite likely i will be thrown in jail if the interviwer makes the slightest weird or off color comment..to either of us.
my pateince with them in the face of the obviuous contradictions in thier process is completely over.I have had it.
anyone here with my bail covered?
sorry for the rant.
but be advised , if you marry abroad you will be dealing with bureacratic stupidity at its highest and most inefficeint level.